1998
DOI: 10.1093/protein/11.12.1147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple conformation space search protocols for the evaluation of enantioselectivity of lipases

Abstract: Two computational protocols have been evaluated regarding their ability to reproduce the enthalpic part of lipase enantioselectivity by forcefield potential energy differences (deltaV#R-S). Though the shortcomings of the approach are numerous, good qualitative results have been obtained here and elsewhere. The anticipated improvement of quantitative results by use of a second protocol, which did not impose any atom movement restrictions on the total system, was realized only in part. Seemingly, results depende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this causes structural changes or leaves an empty space within the enzyme remains unknown until the structure is solved. The fact that Δ R‐S Δ H ‡ significantly increased for W104H would result in an erroneous prediction of a very high enantioselectivity if only enthalpic energy considerations were made, as is done in most contemporary molecular modeling of enzyme catalysis where the entropic components generally are neglected (Hæffner et al 1998; Ke et al 1998; Orrenius et al 1998a,b). Attempts to calculate activation entropy in enzyme catalysis with computer modeling have recently appeared in literature (Strajbl et al 2000; Villa et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this causes structural changes or leaves an empty space within the enzyme remains unknown until the structure is solved. The fact that Δ R‐S Δ H ‡ significantly increased for W104H would result in an erroneous prediction of a very high enantioselectivity if only enthalpic energy considerations were made, as is done in most contemporary molecular modeling of enzyme catalysis where the entropic components generally are neglected (Hæffner et al 1998; Ke et al 1998; Orrenius et al 1998a,b). Attempts to calculate activation entropy in enzyme catalysis with computer modeling have recently appeared in literature (Strajbl et al 2000; Villa et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, there have been many other attempts to evaluate enantiomeric ratio by molecular modeling. For instance, enantioselectivity has been correlated, with more or less success, to the difference in the potential energy part ∆U of the free energy difference ∆∆G ‡ between the two enantiomer transition states [11,12,13]. One of the obvious limitations of this kind of calculation is that, while the potential energy of a protein in explicit solvent is typically of the order of several thousand kilocalories per mole, the energy difference between R and S tetrahedral intermediates, which are good models for the transition states [14], is expected to be less than five kilocalories per mole, as the difference in free energy ∆∆G ‡ is related to the enantioselectivity, expressed by the enantiomeric ratio E, as follows:∆∆G ‡ = −RT lnE [15,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to calculate enantioselectivity using force-field methods have been made~DeTar, 1981; Bemis et al, 1992;Faber et al, 1994;Orrenius et al, 1998!, for example, calculations of energy Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%