The lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia represents a widely applied catalyst for highly enantioselective resolution of chiral secondary alcohols. While its stereopreference is determined predominantly by the substrate structure, stereoselectivity depends on atomic details of interactions between substrate and lipase. Thirty secondary alcohols with published E values using P. cepacia lipase in hydrolysis or esterification reactions were selected, and models of their octanoic acid esters were docked to the open conformation of P. cepacia lipase. The two enantiomers of 27 substrates bound preferentially in either of two binding modes: the fast-reacting enantiomer in a productive mode and the slow-reacting enantiomer in a nonproductive mode. Nonproductive mode of fast-reacting enantiomers was prohibited by repulsive interactions. For the slow-reacting enantiomers in the productive binding mode, the substrate pushes the active site histidine away from its proper orientation, and the distance d~H NE Ϫ O alc ! between the histidine side chain and the alcohol oxygen increases. d~H NE Ϫ O alc ! was correlated to experimentally observed enantioselectivity: in substrates for which P. cepacia lipase has high enantioselectivity~E Ͼ 100!, d~H NE Ϫ O alc ! is Ͼ2.2 Å for slow-reacting enantiomers, thus preventing efficient catalysis of this enantiomer. In substrates of low enantioselectivity~E Ͻ 20!, the distance d~H NE Ϫ O alc ! is less than 2.0 Å, and slow-and fast-reacting enantiomers are catalyzed at similar rates. For substrates of medium enantioselectivity~20 Ͻ E Ͻ 100!, d~H NE Ϫ O alc ! is around 2.1 Å. This simple model can be applied to predict enantioselectivity of P. cepacia lipase toward a broad range of secondary alcohols.Keywords: enantioselectivity; lipase; model; molecular dynamics; Pseudomonas cepacia; secondary alcohol; stereopreference Lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia~EC 3.1.1.3! is a popular catalyst in organic synthesis~Kazlauskas & Bornscheuer, 1998! for the kinetic resolution of racemic mixtures of secondary alcohols in hydrolysis~Laumen & Schneider, 1988;Liang & Paquette, 1990;Caron & Kazlauskas, 1991;Schneider & Georgens, 1992; Bän-ziger et al., 1993;Itoh et al., 1993;Partali et al., 1993;Takano et al., 1993;Waldinger et al., 1996!, esterification~Burgess & Jennings, 1991Uejima et al., 1993;Chadha & Manohar, 1995;Gaspar & Guerrero, 1995;Hamada et al., 1996;Petschen et al., 1996!, and transesterification~Kaminska et al., 1996;Takagi et al., 1996!. The mechanistic details of the catalytic reaction of serine hydrolases~Chapus et al., 1976;! have been well investigated by quantum-chemical methods like the ab initio and density functional theory~Hu et al., 1998!, and by semiempirical methods~Monecke et al., 1998!. The reaction mechanism of ester hydrolysis~Fig. 1! starts with the formation of a Michaelis complex followed by a first transition state~19! to the first tetrahedral intermediate~2!, where the substrate is covalently linked to side-chain oxygen Og of catalytic serine. The crucial hydrogen bonds...