2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40616-014-0010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple and Conditional Discrimination and Specific Reinforcement in Teaching Reading: An Intervention Package

Abstract: This study evaluated an intervention package combining simple and conditional discrimination training and specific reinforcement for each stimulus class in teaching reading of simple words to individuals with intellectual disabilities. In conditional discrimination training, participants matched printed words and pictures to the recorded sounds made by the pictured objects and animals. Fourteen children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities were assigned to an experimental and a control group. The two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure and its rationale have long been studied in both animals and humans (Dube, McIlvane, Mackay, & Stoddard, 1987;Zaine, Domeniconi, & de Rose, 2014). If a specific reinforcer is used for each comparison stimuli in a conditional discrimination procedure, the reinforcer may become part of the equivalence class, and equivalence relations that include the reinforcer may emerge without deliberate teaching.…”
Section: Strategy 20: Audio-specific Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure and its rationale have long been studied in both animals and humans (Dube, McIlvane, Mackay, & Stoddard, 1987;Zaine, Domeniconi, & de Rose, 2014). If a specific reinforcer is used for each comparison stimuli in a conditional discrimination procedure, the reinforcer may become part of the equivalence class, and equivalence relations that include the reinforcer may emerge without deliberate teaching.…”
Section: Strategy 20: Audio-specific Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the surprisingly limited research examining the multiple possible extensions of CTD to phonics instruction, the explicit evaluation of motivational procedures beyond instructional feedback as a part of instruction for reading decoding skills remains underresearched (National Reading Panel, ). Although many studies examining explicit reading instruction have incorporated motivational strategies such as contingent rewards (e.g., Johnson, Graham, & Harris, ; Zaine, Domeniconi, & de Rose, ), these studies have typically evaluated a complex treatment package rather than isolating the putative importance of the motivational variables. To examine the importance of incorporating motivational strategies into instruction, conditions have to be included in the study that provide instruction with and without the motivational procedure (Noell, Freeland, Witt, & Gansle, ).…”
Section: Motivation To Readmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodological choice of applying tests in extinction without a gradual preparation for the withdrawal of the reinforcing consequences differs from other studies in which the reinforcing consequences applied were contingent on the participation of the individual, not their performance (e.g. Resende, Elias, & Goyos, 2012;Zaine, Domeniconi, & de Rose, 2014), or these consequences were specifi cally used for the choices considered correct (e.g. Domeniconi, 2002;Schusterman & Kastak, 1993;Velasco, Huziwara, Machado, & Tomanari, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%