2000
DOI: 10.1006/eujc.1999.0328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple 0/1-Polytopes

Abstract: For general polytopes, it has turned out that with respect to many questions it suffices to consider only the simple polytopes, i.e., d-dimensional polytopes where every vertex is contained in only d facets. In this paper, we show that the situation is very different within the class of 0/1-polytopes, since every simple 0/1-polytope is the (cartesian) product of some 0/1-simplices (which proves a conjecture of Ziegler), and thus, the restriction to simple 0/1-polytopes leaves only a very small class of objects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper bounds on g nfac (d, n) provided by the polytopes P (d, n) in Proposition 8 are not sharp, at least not for all parameters d and n. This follows, for instance, from the examples of Cartesian products of r 0/1-simplices of dimension d 1 ,…,d r (which are precisely the simple 0/1-polytopes, see Kaibel and Wolff [8]). Such a product is a 0/1-polytope of dimension d = d i with (d i + 1) vertices and d + r facets.…”
Section: An Upper Bound On the Minimal Number Of Facetsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper bounds on g nfac (d, n) provided by the polytopes P (d, n) in Proposition 8 are not sharp, at least not for all parameters d and n. This follows, for instance, from the examples of Cartesian products of r 0/1-simplices of dimension d 1 ,…,d r (which are precisely the simple 0/1-polytopes, see Kaibel and Wolff [8]). Such a product is a 0/1-polytope of dimension d = d i with (d i + 1) vertices and d + r facets.…”
Section: An Upper Bound On the Minimal Number Of Facetsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, a 0/1-polytope is simple if and only if it is the product of 0/1-simplices [8]. Thus, d-dimensional simple 0/1-polytopes with n vertices do only exist if there is a factorization n = n i of n with d = (n i − 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…P : f-vector (8,21,22,9) Q 1 : f-vector (7,19,23,11) Q 2 : f-vector (8,25,32,15) Let us now consider the general case of a d-dimensional face of a permutation polytope. d = 2: The triangle and the square are the only two-dimensional 0/1-polytopes.…”
Section: Classification Of 4-dimensional Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Bøgvad's conjecture holds for compressed polytopes. Indeed, a compressed polytope is integral-affinely equivalent to a 0-1 polytope by Proposition 5.1, and a smooth 0-1 polytope is the product of 0-1 simplices by [23], hence the toric ideal of a smooth compressed polytope is generated in degree two (say by Lemma 4.2), moreover it possesses a quadratic quadratic Gröbner basis (by [37,Theorem 13]). Note that when (Q, θ) is tight (cf.…”
Section: Toric Ideals Of Compressed Polytopesmentioning
confidence: 99%