2015
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0390-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity to the self influences cortical recruitment during impression formation

Abstract: Prior work has shown that whether or not someone is similar to the self influences person memory—a type of self-reference effect for others. In this study, we were interested in understanding the neural regions supporting the generation of impressions and subsequent memory for targets who vary in similarity to the self. Participants underwent fMRI scanning while forming positive or negative impressions of face-behavior pairs. We tested participants’ memory for their generated impressions, and then back-sorted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, perhaps an aggressive or assertive individual is someone you would want as a teammate or legal advocate, whereas a caring individual is someone you would want as a friend or caregiver when recuperating from surgery. Other work is consistent with our findings in showing that there is not an overall bias for positive or negative character information to be better remembered by younger or older adults, but that additional factors, such as whether the trait is shared by the self (Leshikar, Cassidy, & Gutchess, 2015;Leshikar, Park, et al, 2015) or pertains to morality (Hess & Kotter-Grühn, 2011) can influence whether positive or negative trait information about others is prioritized in memory. The interplay between social and emotional factors is an interesting direction for future work, particularly in terms of the shared versus distinct effects of aging (Kensinger & Gutchess, 2015, 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, perhaps an aggressive or assertive individual is someone you would want as a teammate or legal advocate, whereas a caring individual is someone you would want as a friend or caregiver when recuperating from surgery. Other work is consistent with our findings in showing that there is not an overall bias for positive or negative character information to be better remembered by younger or older adults, but that additional factors, such as whether the trait is shared by the self (Leshikar, Cassidy, & Gutchess, 2015;Leshikar, Park, et al, 2015) or pertains to morality (Hess & Kotter-Grühn, 2011) can influence whether positive or negative trait information about others is prioritized in memory. The interplay between social and emotional factors is an interesting direction for future work, particularly in terms of the shared versus distinct effects of aging (Kensinger & Gutchess, 2015, 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Color context memory estimates for both encoding conditions (survival, moving) were calculated as the proportion of color hits (correct color recognition) out of item hits (correct item recognition), which removes the influence of item memory on the context memory measures ( Murnane and Bayen, 1996 ), as we have done before ( Leshikar et al, 2014 , 2016 ; Leshikar and Gutchess, 2015 ). Results of the color context analysis revealed no main effect of condition, F (1, 26) = 1.17, p = 0.288, η 2 = 0.04.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…self-relevant traits, own name, own face, autobiographical memories) as opposed to stimuli related to others. Several key regions along the cortical midline appear to show greater activation to self-related stimuli than other-related stimuli (Heatherton, 2006;Northoff et al, 2006;Northoff, Qin, & Feinberg, 2011), including the anterior cingulate cortex (Leshikar, Cassidy, & Gutchess, 2016), the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the vAI (Murray, Debbané, Fox, Bzdok, & Eickhoff, 2015). The mPFC is particularly involved in the processing of information about people's traits, preferences and beliefs (Frith & Frith, 2003;Ma, Baetens, Vandekerckhove, Van der Cruyssen, & Van Overwalle, 2013;Schilbach, 2015) and shows sensitivity to a number of social factors including social status and ostracism (Muscatell et al, 2012;Powers, Wagner, Norris, & Heatherton, 2013).…”
Section: Conceptual Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%