2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-011-9499-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity solutions for unsteady shear-stress-driven flow of Newtonian and power-law fluids: slender rivulets and dry patches

Abstract: This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/34258/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing (40) with the corresponding equation for a very wide ridge (12) reveals that, as might have been expected, the normal component of gravity is negligible for a narrower ridge, and hence that the leading order solutions for narrower sessile and pendent ridges are identical. Moreover, comparing the definitions of Λ for very wide and narrower ridges (given by (13) and (41), respectively) reveals that the airflow required to support even a narrower ridge on a substrate which is not nearly horizontal is stronger than that required to support a very wide ridge on a nearly horizontal substrate (specifically, U ∞ must be larger by a factor of…”
Section: A Narrower (But Still Wide) Sessile or Pendent Ridgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing (40) with the corresponding equation for a very wide ridge (12) reveals that, as might have been expected, the normal component of gravity is negligible for a narrower ridge, and hence that the leading order solutions for narrower sessile and pendent ridges are identical. Moreover, comparing the definitions of Λ for very wide and narrower ridges (given by (13) and (41), respectively) reveals that the airflow required to support even a narrower ridge on a substrate which is not nearly horizontal is stronger than that required to support a very wide ridge on a nearly horizontal substrate (specifically, U ∞ must be larger by a factor of…”
Section: A Narrower (But Still Wide) Sessile or Pendent Ridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have, of course, also been many other studies in which the pressure gradient and/or the shear stress on a thin film of fluid due to an airflow is prescribed rather than being coupled to the unknown free surface profile (see, for example, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] ), but these are less directly relevant to the present strongly coupled problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with U ∞ again as in (18). Curves of constant Ψ in the X-Y plane may be regarded as effective streamlines of this depth-integrated flow, with the streamline Ψ = 0 corresponding to the axis…”
Section: Depth-integrated Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find power-law dependencies on the distance down the plane for the width and the height of the resulting film. Further analysis of gravity-driven rivulet flow of Newtonian and power-law fluids down an inclined plane is given in Yatim, Wilson & Duffy (2010), whereas shear-stress-driven flow is considered in Yatim, Duffy & Wilson (2012). Corresponding travelling-wave similarity solutions are found in Yatim, Duffy & Wilson (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%