1978
DOI: 10.1007/3540088121_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity relations and their experimental verification for strong intensity fluctuations of laser radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The σ 2 R values were calculated from the path-averaged refractive index structure constant, C 2 n , measured during the experiments, according to σ 2 R = 1.23C 2 n k 7/6 L 11/6 (k = wave number, L = propagation distance). These values cover the range from relatively weak turbulence (σ 2 R = 0.2) to the scintillation saturation regime [21] (σ 2 R = 10). The irradiance values, I, were normalized by their respective average, I , in order to allow for an easier comparison of the curves.…”
Section: Experimental System Arrangement and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The σ 2 R values were calculated from the path-averaged refractive index structure constant, C 2 n , measured during the experiments, according to σ 2 R = 1.23C 2 n k 7/6 L 11/6 (k = wave number, L = propagation distance). These values cover the range from relatively weak turbulence (σ 2 R = 0.2) to the scintillation saturation regime [21] (σ 2 R = 10). The irradiance values, I, were normalized by their respective average, I , in order to allow for an easier comparison of the curves.…”
Section: Experimental System Arrangement and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The elaboration consists in evaluating, ever 5 min of recording, the centred moments m i up to the fifth order and the statistical coefficients y i up to the third order The results of the elaboration are shown in figure 2, plotted against time . The choice of the 5 min duration is justified both by the intent of reducing the error source indicated in [10] and by the analysis developed in [14] and [15] (see also [8]) .…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Otago] At 02:21 03 January 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, several phenomena occur at detection that may distort the revealed signal, and hence its statistics and its variance <X 2 >, with respect to the incident signal . Gracheva et al [10] indicated the possible effects of the finite duration of the measurement time . In previous papers [8,11,12], we studied the effects of the non-linearity of the detecting system, reaching the conclusion that the experimental data could be explained, more than qualitatively, in terms of a log-normally distributed incident signal distorted at detection [8] because of the non-linearity of the detecting system .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, for 07 2 > 1 the irradiance variance saturates, that is, it reaches a peak (referred to as the strong-focusing regime) and then slowly decreases with increasing total turbulence. 3 Over the past decade considerable progress has been made in understanding the saturation of scintillation, in particular for horizontal propagation through homogeneous turbulence. For example, the role of the inner scale has been elucidated 4 and has been found to have a greater significance for spherical waves than for plane waves.'"'…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%