2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10838-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity measures in automated essay scoring systems: A ten-year review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system can provide immediate feedback on their written responses, allowing them to identify areas for improvement and adjust their study strategies accordingly. Likewise, a number of previous studies (e.g., He et al, 2022;Ramnarain-Seetohul et al, 2022) have established that AES systems effectively provide students with immediate feedback on their written responses. This feedback mechanism assists learners in recognizing areas for improvement, guiding their study strategies, and enhancing their writing skills (Phoophuangpairoj & Pipattarasakul, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system can provide immediate feedback on their written responses, allowing them to identify areas for improvement and adjust their study strategies accordingly. Likewise, a number of previous studies (e.g., He et al, 2022;Ramnarain-Seetohul et al, 2022) have established that AES systems effectively provide students with immediate feedback on their written responses. This feedback mechanism assists learners in recognizing areas for improvement, guiding their study strategies, and enhancing their writing skills (Phoophuangpairoj & Pipattarasakul, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, several empirical investigations have underscored the time-saving potential of AES systems. For example, the research by Hussein et al (2019), Phoophuangpairoj andPipattarasakul (2022), andRamnarain-Seetohul et al (2022) has shown that automated systems significantly reduce the time required for scoring and reporting, compared to manual grading methods. This efficiency is Contemporary Educational Technology, 2023 Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep475…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the use of artificial intelligence in education focus on various areas such as intelligent tutoring system (ITS), (Chen, 2008;Rastegarmoghadam & Ziarati, 2017), personalized learning (Chen & Hsu, 2008;Narciss et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2018), assessment-feedback (Cope et al, 2021;Muñoz-Merino et al, 2018;Ramnarain-Seetohul et al, 2022;Ramesh & Sanampudi, 2022;Samarakou et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018), educational data mining (Chen & Chen, 2009;Munir et al, 2022) and adaptive learning (Arroyo et al, 2014;Wauters et al, 2010;Kardan et al, 2015). These studies aim to improve the quality of the learning-teaching process by providing individualized learning experiences and increasing the effectiveness of teaching methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology-powered advances are being incorporated into large-scale writing assessments, automated essay scoring (AES) has received increasing attention, offering a viable alternative to the traditionally time-intensive and laborious manual grading processes [1][2][3]. Due to remarkable advances in corpus linguistics [4,5], natural language processing (NLP) [6,7], and deep learning [3,8,9], AES has the benefits of improved consistency, reduced subjectivity, and constructive feedback by exploiting extensive linguistic features or incorporating cutting-edging algorithms [10][11][12][13][14]. Given the importance of AES, it is unsurprising that the investigation into the power of linguistic features characterizing writing quality has become a critical focus within the domains of writing assessment and instruction in the past five decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%