Similarity measures between SAR and optic data

Abstract

With the development of remotely-sensed multisensor satellites like Pleiades Cosmo-Skymed that have the particularity of providing both SAR and optic data, new techniques in image processing are needed. These techniques must take into account the complementarities and differences in nature of these data. A preliminary operation for advanced techniques that use multisensor images such as fusion, classification, etc. is registration. In the case of SAR and optic data, we can do automatic registration if we exactly know the sensor parameters and have a digital terrain model (DTM) or a digital elevation model (DEM) at our disposal. If we do not have an exact knowledge of these parameters, the registration becomes difficult. Another approach to achieve the automatic registration which does not need sensor parameters will rely on comparison measures between both data. In this paper, we present a comparison of several similarity measures between multisensor SAR and optic images used in matching algorithms. An evaluation of these measures for synthetic data based on their distributions is given. Then results on real images are analyzed.

Remote Sensing Image Fusion for Unsupervised Land Cover Classification

“…-The optimization strategy: it determines the best processing within the meaning of a certain similarity criteria and a deformation model. Depending on the type of deformation model, there are two types of registration: rigid and elastic registration [Shabou et al, 2007]. Among rigid registration family, there are linear or nonlinear transformations.…”

Radar Remote Sensing of Urban Areas

“…In Inglada and Giros (2004) and Shabou et al (2007), some of them are analyzed and compared. In Inglada and Giros (2004) and Shabou et al (2007), some of them are analyzed and compared.…”