1999
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity and features of natural textures.

Abstract: In 3 experiments the type of model that is best for conceptualizing the attentive similarity of natural textures was investigated. Different groups of participants placed pictures into groups however they wished, described the resulting clusters and multidimensional scaling dimensions, identified the objects or surfaces depicted in the pictures, and ranked the pictures along several hypothesized attribute-based dimensions. Results indicate that similarity is context dependent, that natural textures seem to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MDS representations have their origins in, and some considerable status as, plausible models of human conceptual structure, particularly in relation to lowlevel, continuous sensory stimulus domains (Shepard, 1957(Shepard, , 1987(Shepard, , 1994. For this reason, MDS representations have been used as a tool for analyzing the psychological similarity structure of a variety of stimulus domains (e.g., Glushko, 1975;Jones, Roberts, & Holman, 1978;Heaps & Handel, 1999). In addition, they are used as the representational basis of a number of successful cognitive models, including the Generalized Context Model (Nosofsky, 1984(Nosofsky, , 1986, and ALCOVE (Kruschke, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDS representations have their origins in, and some considerable status as, plausible models of human conceptual structure, particularly in relation to lowlevel, continuous sensory stimulus domains (Shepard, 1957(Shepard, , 1987(Shepard, , 1994. For this reason, MDS representations have been used as a tool for analyzing the psychological similarity structure of a variety of stimulus domains (e.g., Glushko, 1975;Jones, Roberts, & Holman, 1978;Heaps & Handel, 1999). In addition, they are used as the representational basis of a number of successful cognitive models, including the Generalized Context Model (Nosofsky, 1984(Nosofsky, , 1986, and ALCOVE (Kruschke, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the axes correlated with the visual properties of repetitiveness, orientation and complexity. These results were questioned by Heaps & Hande [8] who argued that a dimensional model of texture is inappropriate and that texture similarity judgements are context dependent. Better results have been obtained for computational similarity by Long & Leow [9] and Petrou et al [11] however, these again used the limited Brodatz album which provides a relatively sparse sampling of texture space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The structure of the space of all textures, however, is extremely complex as shown by research in human vision, e.g., [Richards and Koenderink 1995;Heaps and Handel 1999]. Quoting Heaps and Handel [1999], "there is no fixed set of dimensions that characterize natural textures."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%