2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity and attraction effects in episodic memory judgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results support previous evidence that the similarity effect arises in a number of domains (Maylor & Roberts, 2007;Tsetsos et al 2011;Tversky, 1972).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results support previous evidence that the similarity effect arises in a number of domains (Maylor & Roberts, 2007;Tsetsos et al 2011;Tversky, 1972).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…More recently, Choplin and Hummel (2005) found the attraction effect using unidimensional perceptual stimuli. Maylor and Roberts (2007) obtained attraction and similarity effects in an episodic memory task, and Tsetsos, Usher, and McClelland (2011) obtained the similarity effect using time-varying psychophysical stimuli. While these studies have greatly added to our understanding of context effects, they have not demonstrated the occurrence of all three effects in the same, non-consumer-goods domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attraction effect enhances the probability of choosing an option by introducing a similar, but inferior ("decoy") option (Choplin & Hummel, 2005;Huber et al, 1982;Maylor & Roberts, 2007). Cotisider the choice set {X, Y] and the decoy R^, which is a I i Y Attribute P Figure I, The various options producing context effects plotted in a two-dimensional space defined by two attribute values such as price and quality.…”
Section: The Attraction Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This research finds that adding or removing irrelevant alternatives—or decoys—from the set of available choice options can alter preferences. Recently, psychologists have begun extending this research to inference and judgment (Choplin & Hummel, ; Maylor & Roberts, ; Trueblood, ; Trueblood, Brown, & Heathcote, in press; Trueblood, Brown, Heathcote, & Busemeyer, ). As in the domain of preferential choice, this work finds that adding or removing irrelevant alternatives from the set of available responses can alter stated beliefs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%