2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr019961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and differences between three coexisting spaceborne radars in global rainfall and snowfall estimation

Abstract: Precipitation is one of the most important components in the water and energy cycles. Radars are considered the best available technology for observing the spatial distribution of precipitation either from the ground since the 1980s or from space since 1998. This study, for the first time ever, compares and evaluates the only three existing spaceborne precipitation radars, i.e., the Ku‐band precipitation radar (PR), the W‐band Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR), and the Ku/Ka‐band Dual‐frequency Precipitation Radar (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This matchup group is hereinafter referred to as Group 1. This relative large temporal difference is adopted to acquire adequate coincident events to support solid statistical analysis [29]. We also tried other time intervals ranging from 5 to 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This matchup group is hereinafter referred to as Group 1. This relative large temporal difference is adopted to acquire adequate coincident events to support solid statistical analysis [29]. We also tried other time intervals ranging from 5 to 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results applying the whole swath data are presented and discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.2. Furthermore, since the TRMM PR scan pattern and GPM DPR normal scan pattern are very similar, we first selected the matchup pixels of all the DPR NS swath (referred to as DPR_NS) and TRMM PR swath within a time interval of 20 min and a space interval of two km same as those used in [29]. This matchup group is hereinafter referred to as Group 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations