Similarities and contradictions in the core logic of three strategy research streams

Abstract

The logical foundations shaping three prominent streams of strategic management thought are summarized and then compared and contrasted. The intent is to determine whether these research streams are restatements of a single core logic using different terms to describe the same phenomena and relationships, or whether they provide alternate, and potentially competing, explanations for effective strategic action. Analysis reveals some concordant assertions, some similarities across pairs of frameworks, and some fundamental contradictions among the various logic sets. Since key elements in the fundamental premises of each research stream present logical contradictions with each of the other two, a strategy derived from an integration of these perspectives creates inconsistencies in a firm’s enacted context, its assumptions about strategy making, and its administrative arrangements. As circumstances change, a firm may be required to undergo a ‘core logic shift’ to maintain consistency between its strategy and its strategic context. When a shift becomes necessary, a firm needs to overcome structural inertia, competitive inertia, organizational momentum, and its current management logic to maintain internal consistency. Additional implications of the comparison of these three logics for both theory and practice are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Marketing activities as critical success factors: The case of seed producer cooperatives in Ethiopia

“…However, RBV is criticized as it lacks to explain how resources are developed and deployed to achieve competitive advantage, and it does not consider the impact of dynamic market environments (Lengnick-Hall and Wolff, 1999;Priem and Bulter, 2001).…”

Market growth through mergers and acquisitions: The role of the relationship marketing manager in sustaining performance

“…The subordinate employees (of the RMM in this instance) are critical to the effective execution component of marketing strategy (Fiol, 1991;Lado & Wilson, 1994;Lee & Miller, 1999;Morgan and Hunt, 1994) as well as the development and dissemination of knowledge and organizational learning within the organization (Fiol, 1991;Hall, 1993;Miller & Shamsie, 1996). A study by Lengnick-Hall & Wolff (1999) using three perspectives in marketing and management strategy (Resource based, Hypercompetitive and high-velocity, plus ecosystem and chaos theory-based views) established common themes concerning this human dimension.…”

In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs

“…The literature is clear that firms differ based on organisational capabilities (Barney, 1991;Dierickx and Cool, 1989;Hansen and Wernerfelt, 1989), and that such capabilities are used to 'create and exploit external opportunities and develop sustained advantages' (Lengnick-Hall and Wolff, 1999). While previous research primarily focused on larger firms, Floyd and Wooldridge (1999) contend that SMEs face important challenges as they decide whether to build on their existing organisational capabilities or pursue entirely new business ventures.…”