Abstract:Throughout much of the 20th century, unprecedented industrial emissions have led to widespread acidification of regions in North America and Europe and, as lake water pH dropped, aquatic ecosystems have experienced dramatic declines in biodiversity. International emission‐control agreements have led to sweeping increases in lake pH, however acid‐structured zooplankton communities still persist in many lakes. Concomitantly, calcium concentrations have been declining as a legacy of acidification and are approach… Show more
“…However, the lack of biotic responses in those lakes may also be caused by the persistent low pH (average values during the last 5 years of sampling: 5.3 ± 0.2, no significant increases during the study period) and the combination of low calcium and high humic content. Low calcium concentration has been shown to limit the recovery of zooplankton after acidification independently of improvement in pH (Ross & Arnott, 2022) and, when associated with high content of humic matter, it even causes declines in zooplankton biomass (Leach et al, 2019). On the other hand, humic substances can buffer against detrimental effects of aluminum (Besser et al, 2019;Herrmann, 2001;Locke, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gray and Arnott (2009) showed that zooplankton response to the recovery of surface‐water chemistry could vary from limited recovery of species richness in heavily acidified lakes to full recovery in moderately acidified lakes. The recovery of zooplankton from acidification seems to be more strongly affected by physico‐chemical variables, such as persisting low pH, calcium concentration (Ross & Arnott, 2022), and content of organic matter (Leach et al, 2019), than by recolonization from external sources (Keller et al, 2002). Climate change has also been shown to affect several facets of zooplankton communities, such as species distribution, body size, abundances, diversity, food web interactions, and phenology (Carter & Schindler, 2012; Vadadi‐Fülöp et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous assessments, we expected that physico‐chemical recovery would lead to changes in zooplankton communities, namely, increases in number of species, number of acid‐sensitive species and functional diversity. As calcium and organic matter concentration strongly influence zooplankton communities (Leach et al, 2019; Ross & Arnott, 2022), we also expected the changes in zooplankton communities to vary across the different lake types, with stronger recovery at lakes with higher concentrations of calcium and mixed responses at lakes with higher concentrations of humic substances.…”
Acidification has harmed freshwater ecosystems in Northern Europe since the early 1900s. Stricter regulations aimed at decreasing acidic emissions have improved surface‐water chemistry since the late 1980s but the recovery of biotic communities has not been consistent. Generally, the recovery of flora and fauna has been documented only for a few lakes or regions and large‐scale assessments of long‐term dynamics of biotic communities due to improved water quality are still lacking. This study investigates a large biomonitoring dataset of pelagic and littoral crustacean zooplankton (Cladocera and Copepoda) from 142 acid‐sensitive lakes in Norway spanning 24 years (1997–2020). The aims were to assess the changes in zooplankton communities through time, compare patterns of changes across lake types (defined based on calcium and humic content), and identify correlations between abiotic and biological variables. Our results indicate chemical and biological recovery after acidification, as shown by a general increase in pH, acid neutralizing capacity, changes in community composition and increases in the total number of species, number of acid‐sensitive species and functional richness through time. However, the zooplankton responses differ across lake types. This indicates that the concentration of calcium (or alkalinity) and total organic carbon (or humic substances) are important factors for the recovery. Therefore, assessment methods and management tools should be adapted to the diverse lake types. Long‐term monitoring of freshwater ecosystems is needed to fully comprehend the recovery dynamics of biotic communities from acidification.
“…However, the lack of biotic responses in those lakes may also be caused by the persistent low pH (average values during the last 5 years of sampling: 5.3 ± 0.2, no significant increases during the study period) and the combination of low calcium and high humic content. Low calcium concentration has been shown to limit the recovery of zooplankton after acidification independently of improvement in pH (Ross & Arnott, 2022) and, when associated with high content of humic matter, it even causes declines in zooplankton biomass (Leach et al, 2019). On the other hand, humic substances can buffer against detrimental effects of aluminum (Besser et al, 2019;Herrmann, 2001;Locke, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gray and Arnott (2009) showed that zooplankton response to the recovery of surface‐water chemistry could vary from limited recovery of species richness in heavily acidified lakes to full recovery in moderately acidified lakes. The recovery of zooplankton from acidification seems to be more strongly affected by physico‐chemical variables, such as persisting low pH, calcium concentration (Ross & Arnott, 2022), and content of organic matter (Leach et al, 2019), than by recolonization from external sources (Keller et al, 2002). Climate change has also been shown to affect several facets of zooplankton communities, such as species distribution, body size, abundances, diversity, food web interactions, and phenology (Carter & Schindler, 2012; Vadadi‐Fülöp et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous assessments, we expected that physico‐chemical recovery would lead to changes in zooplankton communities, namely, increases in number of species, number of acid‐sensitive species and functional diversity. As calcium and organic matter concentration strongly influence zooplankton communities (Leach et al, 2019; Ross & Arnott, 2022), we also expected the changes in zooplankton communities to vary across the different lake types, with stronger recovery at lakes with higher concentrations of calcium and mixed responses at lakes with higher concentrations of humic substances.…”
Acidification has harmed freshwater ecosystems in Northern Europe since the early 1900s. Stricter regulations aimed at decreasing acidic emissions have improved surface‐water chemistry since the late 1980s but the recovery of biotic communities has not been consistent. Generally, the recovery of flora and fauna has been documented only for a few lakes or regions and large‐scale assessments of long‐term dynamics of biotic communities due to improved water quality are still lacking. This study investigates a large biomonitoring dataset of pelagic and littoral crustacean zooplankton (Cladocera and Copepoda) from 142 acid‐sensitive lakes in Norway spanning 24 years (1997–2020). The aims were to assess the changes in zooplankton communities through time, compare patterns of changes across lake types (defined based on calcium and humic content), and identify correlations between abiotic and biological variables. Our results indicate chemical and biological recovery after acidification, as shown by a general increase in pH, acid neutralizing capacity, changes in community composition and increases in the total number of species, number of acid‐sensitive species and functional richness through time. However, the zooplankton responses differ across lake types. This indicates that the concentration of calcium (or alkalinity) and total organic carbon (or humic substances) are important factors for the recovery. Therefore, assessment methods and management tools should be adapted to the diverse lake types. Long‐term monitoring of freshwater ecosystems is needed to fully comprehend the recovery dynamics of biotic communities from acidification.
“…Freshwater acidification is harmful to various aquatic organisms. Climate warming and changes in water chemistry profoundly affect the pond’s pH (Ross and Arnott 2022 ). The rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide lowers the pH in ponds.…”
Section: Physical Chemical and Biological Pressures On Pondsmentioning
Healthy pond ecosystems are critical for achieving several sustainable development goals (SDG) through numerous ecosystem services (e.g., flood control, nutrient retention, and carbon sequestration). However, the socio-economic and ecological value of ponds is often underestimated compared to the larger water bodies. Ponds are highly vulnerable to mounting land-use pressures (e.g., urban expansion, and agriculture intensification) and environmental changes, leading to degradation and loss of the pond ecosystem. The narrow utilitarian use-based conservation fails to recognize the multiple anthropogenic pressures and provides narrow solutions which are inefficient to regenerate the degraded pond ecosystem. In this paper, we holistically examined the legal challenges (policies) and key anthropogenic and environmental pressures responsible for pond degradation in India. The country is strongly dedicated to attaining SDG and circular economy (CE) through aquatic ecosystem conservation and restoration. Considerable efforts are required at the administration level to recognize the contribution of pond ecosystem services in attaining global environmental goals and targets. Worldwide restoration strategies were reviewed, and a framework for pond restoration and conservation was proposed, which includes policies and incentives, technologies such as environmental-DNA (e-DNA), life cycle assessment (LCA), and other ecohydrological measures. Nature-based solutions (NBS) offer a sustainable and cost-effective approach to restoring the pond’s natural processes. Furthermore, linkage between the pond ecosystem and the CE was assessed to encourage a regenerative system for biodiversity conservation. This study informs the need for extensive actions and legislative reforms to restore and conserve the pond ecosystems.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13157-022-01624-9.
“…6,7 D. magna required high levels of Ca from the surrounding medium to support regular molting, development, reproduction, and other physiological functions. 8 Within D. magna, Ca was primarily distributed in the exoskeleton in the form of carbonates and phosphates. 9 It was reported that Ca concentration of D. magna increased with the Ca contents in the aqueous environment.…”
Calcium is a highly demanded metal, and its transport across the intestine of Daphnia magna remains a significant unresolved question. Due to technical constraints, the visualization of the kinetic process of Ca passage through D. magna has been challenging. Here, we developed the second near-infrared Ca sensor (NIR-II Ca) and conducted real-time in vivo imaging of Ca in daphnids with a high signal-to-noise ratio, deep tissue penetration, and minimal damage. Through the utilization of the NIR-II Ca sensor, we for the first time visualized and quantified the kinetic process of Ca passage in the intestine in real time. The results revealed that trophically available Ca passed through the intestines in 24 h, whereas waterborne Ca required only 35 min. This rapid "flushing through" mechanism established waterborne Ca as the primary source of Ca absorption. However, environmental stressors such as water acidification and cadmium significantly delayed the Ca passage and absorption. The development of NIR imaging and sensors allows for real-time dynamic visualization of contaminants/nutrients in organisms and holds great potential as a powerful tool for future studies into material kinetic processes in living animals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.