Similar compositional turnover but distinct insular environmental and geographical drivers of native and exotic ants in two oceans

Abstract

Aim This study aims to quantify the patterns in compositional turnover of native and exotic ants on small islands in two oceans, and to explore whether such patterns are driven by similar environmental, geographical and potentially biotic variables. Location Pacific and Atlantic islands. Time period Present. Major taxa studied Ants. Methods We applied Multi‐Site Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling (MS‐GDM), which relates zeta diversity, the number of species shared by a given number of islands, to differences in environmental, geographical and biotic drivers. The use of zeta diversity enabled us to differentiate the contribution of rare species (shared by few islands) from those of widespread ones (shared by multiple islands) to compositional turnover. For completion, we also related species richness of insular ants per island with the same set of explanatory variables using Generalised Additive Models (GAM). Results Pacific and Atlantic islands have similar patterns of ant species turnover and richness, albeit partly driven by different drivers. Native and exotic species turnover are mostly explained by the same set of variables in the Pacific (annual precipitation and distance to the nearest island), but not in the Atlantic (annual precipitation is a good predictor of native species turnover, but none of the variables considered in our study explained exotic species turnover). No signal of biotic interactions was detected at the insular community level. Main conclusions Successful invasion strategies may depend on a combination of factors specific to the region in question. In the Pacific, milder environments and the absence of natives on certain islands enable exotic ants to select the same types of environment as native ants. In the harsher Atlantic Ocean, however, native ant species are likely to be well adapted to local environmental conditions, making it harder for exotics to become established. Exotic ant species, therefore, potentially rely on other attributes to establish, such as a combination of tolerance to a wide range of environmental conditions and human‐mediated colonization.

Invasion syndromes: a systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management

“…The biotic and abiotic characteristics of the recipient ecosystem, including its anthropogenic modifications (Kueffer 2017), influence alien species' invasion dynamics and impact (Hood and Naiman 2000;Denslow 2003;Riley et al 2005;Johnson et al 2008;Catford et al 2009;Vermonden et al 2010;Pyšek et al 2012bPyšek et al , 2017. A wide range of characteristics of the recipient ecosystem can be important: from broad classifications such as biome types (Campbell 1996), ecoregions (Olson and Dinerstein 2002;Abell et al 2008) or habitats (Chytrý et al 2008a, b;Latombe et al 2019b), to more specific abiotic (e.g. altitude, precipitation or nutrient availability; Chytrý et al 2008a, b), biotic (e.g.…”

What Will the Future Bring for Biological Invasions on Islands? An Expert-Based Assessment

“…Improved understanding of these issues should lead ultimately to better knowledge on how invasion impacts could change over time in magnitude and geographical distribution (Lenzner et al, 2019). Answers to these questions are complex, as drivers of biological invasions may change distinctly across taxa, habitats and island regions (Latombe et al, 2019b).…”

The ecological impact of pest-induced tree dieback on insect biodiversity in Yunnan pine plantations, China

“…Zeta diversity order 4, for instance, is the mean number of species shared by 4 sites (in a dataset of 100 sites, there are ~ 3.9 million combinations of 4 sites). Zeta diversities can be converted to multi-site equivalents of the pairwise Jaccard dissimilarity and used as response variables in an MS-GDM (Latombe et al, 2017(Latombe et al, , 2019, with the six environmental covariates as candidate predictors (Table 1), rescaled between 0 and 1. We also used zeta diversity to ask if the insect communities in low-and high-infestation forests show evidence for different assembly mechanisms, by using the 'zetadiv' package to calculate zeta diversity decline and species retention rates for low-and for highinfestation forests.…”