SimBlock Simulator Enhancement with Difficulty Level Algorithm Based on Proof-of-Work Consensus for Lightweight Blockchain

Abstract

Proof-of-Work (PoW) was the first blockchain consensus protocol discovered, followed by Proof-of-Stake and others. The disadvantage of the PoW is that it requires high energy consumption compared to other consensus protocols. Based on this weakness, some researchers proposed a lightweight blockchain technology, a modified blockchain that has a simplified algorithm but does not reduce the security factor. This lightweight blockchain is suitable for applications requiring data reliability but with limited computing resources, such as Internet of Things devices. This paper discussed and modified the SimBlock simulator as one of the existing blockchain simulators. It has a visualization tool to look further into the propagation transition of the block. Unfortunately, the existing PoW consensus on the SimBlock simulator is unable to pinpoint the actual hash computation method. Therefore, the hashing process in the SimBlock simulator was modified by including the difficulty level for finding the hash target. The purpose of including the difficulty level was to determine how long it takes to create a block. By knowing the time needed, a recommendation could be obtained for the most suitable difficulty level for a lightweight blockchain and its implementation with IoT devices. There are two options of approaches to the difficulty level referred to in this paper; finding the number of zeros that appear sequentially and are in front of a hash value (leading zero) and finding the number of zeros that appear arbitrarily (count zero). For example, the first difficulty level on a leading-zero quest has the same meaning as searching for a leading zero, the second level of difficulty is the search for the two leading zeros, etc. The block generation time on a blockchain network using the PoW consensus highly depends on the difficulty level. Block generation time and resource utility have been analyzed and compared with other blockchain simulators and existing networks, such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The modified SimBlock simulator was tested in this experiment using 100–600 nodes, with the expected result of creating 100–1000 blocks. Based on the experiments, creating a block using leading zeros as the hash target for the first to fourth difficulty levels took less than 1 s, whereas when using count zeros (zero-count) as the target hash, it took less than 1 s for the first to fifteenth difficulty levels. Using leading zeros took approximately 237.4 s at difficulty level 7, while count-zero took approximately 633.8 s at difficulty level 19. The experiment was not continued at the next difficulty level because it required a longer compilation time. With the modifications made, the creation of a block on a blockchain network using the PoW consensus can be clearly seen. The difficulty level added to the simulator can also provide information for determining the difficulty level to be implemented on the lightweight blockchain.

Blockchain-Enabled Secure Distributed Event Logging in the Industrial Internet of Things

“…Miner using a single core takes a µ Tm and maximum mining time (T m(max) ) of 1.3 sec and 5.3 sec, respectively, whereas, a miner with maximum potential (using 4 cores) has a µ Tm and T m(max) as 0.9 sec and 1.5 sec, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art presented in [16] where the mining time is achieved as ≈0.9 sec to mine a single block keeping d = 4, in our model it is achieved as low as ≈0.1 sec as presented in Figure 4b. Furthermore, in [16], the payload size is fixed, whereas in our model, the realistic range of variable payload is considered.…”

“…Compared to the state-of-the-art presented in [16] where the mining time is achieved as ≈0.9 sec to mine a single block keeping d = 4, in our model it is achieved as low as ≈0.1 sec as presented in Figure 4b. Furthermore, in [16], the payload size is fixed, whereas in our model, the realistic range of variable payload is considered. Figure 5 presents the comparison of competing and collaborative mining for the mining time by increasing the number of miners.…”

Metaverse: Virtual Currencies as a Mechanism for Employee Engagement and Retention

“…Higher difficulty levels deter attacks like the 51% attack, where one entity controls over 50% of network power, enabling manipulation and disruptions. Difficulty level ensures consistent block creation, balances mining power, incentivises honest participation, and maintains network stability (Mardiansyah and Sari, 2022;Academy, 2023). • Consensus algorithms: Trust in blockchain transactions relies on mathematical algorithms, collectively known as the consensus mechanism (Samuel, 2015).…”

Attestation of Improved SimBlock Node Churn Simulation

“…SimBlock could not faithfully imitate the process of computing hashes according to Mardiansyah et al (2022). As a result, the authors added difficulty levels to SimBlock's hashing algorithm.…”