2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silvopasture in the USA: A systematic review of natural resource professional and producer-reported benefits, challenges, and management activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, this study characterizes the adoption of silvopasture as a complete land conversion from conventional grazing to silvopasture. Yet, this differs in practice as Smith et al (2022) found that 96% of the producers who implemented silvopasture in the USA reported using a combination of both open and reforested pastures. Perhaps the share of unwilling respondents towards silvopasture adoption and the compensation claims may have been found lower if farmers had the choice of the amount of land to convert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, this study characterizes the adoption of silvopasture as a complete land conversion from conventional grazing to silvopasture. Yet, this differs in practice as Smith et al (2022) found that 96% of the producers who implemented silvopasture in the USA reported using a combination of both open and reforested pastures. Perhaps the share of unwilling respondents towards silvopasture adoption and the compensation claims may have been found lower if farmers had the choice of the amount of land to convert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the need for agroforestry systems in agriculture has grown more urgent in recent years, an increasing amount of literature has focused on farmers' perception of such systems, silvopasture included (e.g., Calle et al 2009;Gregory et al 2012;Jerneck and Olsson 2013;Meijer et al 2015;Smith et al 2022). These studies acknowledge the complexity of silvopasture implementation and try to assess what determinants influence adoption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat increase is expected in the future which will affect animal pregnancy rates, weight, milk production, and overall animal health (Smith et al, 2022). The shade provided by trees, specifically in silvopastoral systems, can ease some of the issues that will be encountered in the future (Smith et al, 2022).…”
Section: Microclimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the opportunities and economic and environmental benefits, the adoption of these systems has been slow in the past [17]. Limited knowledge of these systems, site-specific management requirements, and their economic potential have been constraints to the adoption of silvopasture practices [18]. The understanding of the dynamics between shade and animal behavior/productivity is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%