1995
DOI: 10.1021/ic00126a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silver(I)-Selective Thioether Ligands. Solution NMR and X-ray Structural Studies on the Interaction of 2,5,8-Trithia[9]-m-cyclophane and Related Ligands with Silver(I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The angles C10-C7-S1 and C1-S1-C7 are 107.48 (12) and 103.82 (9) , respectively. These bond lengths and angles are all in the normal ranges and compare well those observed in other analogues (Allen et al, 1987;Casabo et al, 1995Casabo et al, ). et al, 1955 (2.75 g, 0.01 mol) was added to a hot solution (about 323 K) of thiophenol sodium salt (2.64 g, 0.02 mol) in ethanol (30 ml), and the mixture was further stirred at 323 K for 6 h. After cooling, water (30 ml) was added and the resulting mixture left to stand for 5 h. The yellow precipitate was filtered off, washed with ethanol and water, and recrystallized from a mixture of chloroform and methanol, giving single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction (yield 3.17 g, 75%, m.p.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The angles C10-C7-S1 and C1-S1-C7 are 107.48 (12) and 103.82 (9) , respectively. These bond lengths and angles are all in the normal ranges and compare well those observed in other analogues (Allen et al, 1987;Casabo et al, 1995Casabo et al, ). et al, 1955 (2.75 g, 0.01 mol) was added to a hot solution (about 323 K) of thiophenol sodium salt (2.64 g, 0.02 mol) in ethanol (30 ml), and the mixture was further stirred at 323 K for 6 h. After cooling, water (30 ml) was added and the resulting mixture left to stand for 5 h. The yellow precipitate was filtered off, washed with ethanol and water, and recrystallized from a mixture of chloroform and methanol, giving single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction (yield 3.17 g, 75%, m.p.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They include the trithiabenzenophane ligand, 2,5,8-trithia(9)m-benzenophane (CSD refcode VEYNES; Groot & Loeb, 1990), and a palladium and a silver complex of the same ligand, viz. dichloro[2,5,8-trithia(9)-m-benzenophane]palladium(II) (KOMNOP; Groot et al, 1991), a mononuclear complex, and poly[[2,5,8-trithia(9)-m-cyclophane-S,S 0 ,S 00 ]silver(I) trifluoromethylsulfonate acetonitrile solvate] (ZIDPEH; Casabo et al, 1995), a two-dimensional coordination polymer. In KOMNOP, the ligand coordinates in a bidentate manner.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For designing such ionophores, the optimum requirement of 2-4 soft (S or N) ligating sites 2-7 preorganized in a three-dimensional system has been emphasized. In the reported Ag ϩ selective ionophores, the presence of ether units 8-12 responsible for binding towards hard alkali, alkaline earth and borderline Pb 2ϩ cations and the possibility of the formation of sandwich or polymeric complexes [13][14][15] creating significant binding towards most soft metal ions, cause lowering of Ag ϩ selectivities. We argued that in such hosts, the absence of hard (ether) ligating sites and the presence of stereochemical or structural features which could inhibit their sandwich or polymeric complexation requiring >1 : 1 stoichiometric host-guest interaction could further enhance the Ag ϩ selectivity even against the similar sized Pb 2ϩ cation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%