2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10020302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?

Abstract: Abstract:To displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore conclude that their feasibility criteria are not useful and do not affect the conclusions of the reviewed studies. Furthermore, we introduce additional, more relevant feasibility criteria, which renewable energy scenarios fulfil, but according to which nuclear power, which the authors have evaluated positively elsewhere [74][75][76], fails to demonstrate adequate feasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore conclude that their feasibility criteria are not useful and do not affect the conclusions of the reviewed studies. Furthermore, we introduce additional, more relevant feasibility criteria, which renewable energy scenarios fulfil, but according to which nuclear power, which the authors have evaluated positively elsewhere [74][75][76], fails to demonstrate adequate feasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With limited participation of demand resources, the wholesale market functioned mainly with network operators selling large central station equipment to meet the steady demand. Renewable energy today is cheaper than coal and nuclear power in most parts of such advanced economies as, for example, the United States and more cost-competitive with natural gas [53,54].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the construction cost of nuclear power in South Korea is reasonably low (<2010 US$ 3,000 kW −1 ) compared with other western systems, due to a standardised manufacturing process and repeated builds of new plants (Lovering, Yip, & Nordhaus, ). Technological development of nuclear reactors, in contrast to renewable energy sources, bolds the promise of providing reliable, clean, and safe energy, in the form of electricity, heat, and as a derivative: synthetic fuels (e.g., hydrogen; Brook, Blees, Wigley, & Hong, ).…”
Section: There Are No “No Regrets” Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%