1995
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199509000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicone Implants and the Inhibition of Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies support our findings which demonstrate that survival is not negatively impacted by reconstruction. Some have hypothesized that reconstruction itself provides a survival advantage to patients through a biological mechanism (17–20). We suggest other more likely possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies support our findings which demonstrate that survival is not negatively impacted by reconstruction. Some have hypothesized that reconstruction itself provides a survival advantage to patients through a biological mechanism (17–20). We suggest other more likely possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast implants may stimulate a local immune response in which cancer cells are more likely to be destroyed [34]. Breast implants may compress breast tissue, reducing the flow of blood and thereby slowing the rate of cell or tumor growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Multiple investigations have to date been alert for the potential adverse health effects of silicone breast implants. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Additional reports have focused on postoperative local complications and patient safety issues in women receiving silicone breast implants. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Capsular contracture is the most common and severe complication associated with silicone breast implants, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] despite innovations in shell surface textures, implant shapes, inner gel composition, surgical implantation techniques, and pocket irrigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%