2022
DOI: 10.1177/17511437221079122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings for preventing facial pressure injuries in COVID-19 patients in prone position

Abstract: The development of facial pressure injury (PI) during prone position is frequently described. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients with facial PIs increased. This quality improvement project describes the effectiveness of using silicone adhesive multilayer foams for preventing facial PIs in COVID-19 patients in need of prone position therapy. After introduction of foam dressing on chin and forehead to the standard protocol procedures for PI prevention, the decrease in number of patients develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
9

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This intervention was widely accepted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic where patients were proned for prolonged periods [13,14]. One quality improvement report described the effectiveness of prophylactic dressings in preventing facial PI among proned patients where 17 of 25 patients in the no dressing group developed a PI compared to 6 of 24 patients in the dressing group (p = 0.003) [15]. Prophylactic dressings remain an adjunct to PI prevention strategies.…”
Section: Knowledge Gains and Prevention Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intervention was widely accepted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic where patients were proned for prolonged periods [13,14]. One quality improvement report described the effectiveness of prophylactic dressings in preventing facial PI among proned patients where 17 of 25 patients in the no dressing group developed a PI compared to 6 of 24 patients in the dressing group (p = 0.003) [15]. Prophylactic dressings remain an adjunct to PI prevention strategies.…”
Section: Knowledge Gains and Prevention Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A NOS avalia os estudos em 3 categorias: a seleção dos grupos de estudo; a comparabilidade dos grupos; e a determinação da exposição ou desfecho de interesse (10) . para leitura de texto completo, dos quais 10 (2,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) foram incluídos no presente estudo (Figura 1). (12) a 284 (13) pacientes.…”
Section: Fontes De Dados E Estratégia De Pesquisaunclassified
“…Quanto à metodologia, 30% (03) eram estudos de coorte retrospectivos baseados em revisão de registro (14,15,16) , 20% (02) caso-controle (13,17) e 50% (05) estudos transversais (18,2,12,19,20) . Os estudos incluídos foram realizados 70% na Europa (2,12,13,14,16,17,18,20) , 20% na América do Norte (15,19) e 10% na Ásia Oriental (18) . As informações apresentam-se sumarizadas na tabela 1.…”
Section: Fontes De Dados E Estratégia De Pesquisaunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations