“…From the dynamic response (Figure , red line), we extracted t rise ∼ 26 μs and t fall ∼ 24 μs using a 10–90% criterion with the average response time of the heater in the order of τ = ( t rise + t fall )/2 ∼ 25 μs, which corresponds to the heating time constant according to the 1/ e criterion of τ 1/ e = τ/2.2 = 11.4 μs. The obtained τ is faster than the reported results on conventional tungsten heaters on top of the waveguide without thermal insulation; however, it is slower compared to TiN, silicon-doped, ,, and graphene-integrated heaters, − as seen in Table . The response time in our device is severely affected by the high resistance (>60 kΩ) of Au/1L-MoS 2 Schottky contacts, considering that the portion of the heat source (hot spot) is located ∼1 μm off the waveguide, instead of being directly distributed on top of the waveguide if the power is mostly dissipated in the MoS 2 channel and not at the contact area.…”