2016
DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon startup schools: technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to its links to the governmentalization of psychological concepts, ClassDojo materializes a particular brand of contemporary educational thought as a direct product of Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley has recently developed significant interests in education, as demonstrated by its massive escalation in venture capital funding for educational technology startup companies and support for high-tech models of alternative schools (Williamson 2016). A distinctive political outlook underpins Silicon Valley's commitment to education.…”
Section: Social-emotional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its links to the governmentalization of psychological concepts, ClassDojo materializes a particular brand of contemporary educational thought as a direct product of Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley has recently developed significant interests in education, as demonstrated by its massive escalation in venture capital funding for educational technology startup companies and support for high-tech models of alternative schools (Williamson 2016). A distinctive political outlook underpins Silicon Valley's commitment to education.…”
Section: Social-emotional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is this evolving public sphere, increasingly mediated by digital technologies, which is under attack from algorithm manipulation, propaganda cyber farms, and other questionable intelligence operations. The solution posed by these technological forces is to increase the reliance on technology in formerly public sector superstructures, most notably in education (Williamson, 2016). The irony here is rich; the companies responsible for the erosion are the ones promising an ever greater investment in their products is the only way to reverse the trend and stop the problem.…”
Section: Beyond the Academy: Cognitive Authority In The "Edtech" Publmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, Ed-Tech speak contains seductive and convincing propositions (i.e., statements about education and how it works), presuppositions (treating certain propositions as given), and interpersonal (how relationships between people are presented) functions (Selwyn 2015, 235). These deterministic and optimistic views of technology as a shaper of the future of education are promoted by powerful global actors such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the European Commission (Saari and Säntti 2018), national educational administrations (Ingelby 2015), and various global technology companies and capital investment firms (Williamson 2018).…”
Section: Researching Ed-tech Speakmentioning
confidence: 99%