2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp0441543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon Monohydride Clusters SinH (n = 4−10) and Their Anions:  Structures, Thermochemistry, and Electron Affinities

Abstract: The molecular structures, electron affinities, and dissociation energies of the Si(n)H/Si(n)H- (n = 4-10) species have been examined via five hybrid and pure density functional theory (DFT) methods. The basis set used in this work is of double-zeta plus polarization quality with additional diffuse s- and p-type functions, denoted DZP++. The geometries are fully optimized with each DFT method independently. The three different types of neutral-anion energy separations presented in this work are the adiabatic el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Si-H distances for all the studied clusters are near to 1.5 Å when H atom binds only to one silicon atom and near to 1.7 Å when the H atom is in a bridge position reflecting the different type of bond. These results are in good agreement with the values reported by Prasad and co-workers 12,13 and Yang et al 42 Other properties are presented in Figs. 6 and 7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Si-H distances for all the studied clusters are near to 1.5 Å when H atom binds only to one silicon atom and near to 1.7 Å when the H atom is in a bridge position reflecting the different type of bond. These results are in good agreement with the values reported by Prasad and co-workers 12,13 and Yang et al 42 Other properties are presented in Figs. 6 and 7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The geometric data for bond angles and bond lengths differed by no more than 2° and 0.02 Å, respectively. Primary differences in geometry arose due to the use of p-type polarization functions for hydrogen atoms and diffuse functions with B3LYP, BHLYP, and BPW91 functionals for the Si 4 species by Li et al BHLYP predicts the most reliable Si–Si bond lengths and B3LYP predicts the most reliable H–Si bond lengths . Primary differences in geometry also arose due to the use of a HF mean field Hamiltonian and a 3-21G(d) split-valence basis set by Swihart et al for the Si 7 species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BHLYP method may provide the most reliable SiSi bond lengths and the B3LYP may provide the most reliable SiH bond lengths. The adiabatic EAs predicted by the B3LYP and the BPW91 methods are reliable 5, 25, 49. The EAs are predicted by the B3LYP or BPW91 method to be 2.72 or 2.73 eV (Si 6 H 3 ), 1.86 or 1.86 eV (Si 6 H 4 ), 2.40 or 2.43 eV (Si 6 H 5 ), 1.60 or 1.60 eV (Si 6 H 6 ), 2.58 or 2.52 eV (Si 6 H 7 ), 1.74 or 1.64 eV (Si 6 H 8 ), 2.57 or 2.60 eV (Si 6 H 9 ), 1.02 or 0.87 eV (Si 6 H 10 ), 2.49 or 2.53 eV (Si 6 H 11 ), 0.33 or 0.49 eV (Si 6 H 12 ), 2.51 or 2.52 eV (Si 6 H 13 ), and 0.53 or 0.66 eV (Si 6 H 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%