2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470513323.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon as an Essential Trace Element in Animal Nutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
106
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is demonstrated that Si has a significant effect on the bone matrix formation and bone calcification (Carlisle 1986(Carlisle , 1988. In our present study, there was a significant improvement in the eggshell weight of laying quails fed diets supplemented with 4000 mg/kg nSiO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…However, it is demonstrated that Si has a significant effect on the bone matrix formation and bone calcification (Carlisle 1986(Carlisle , 1988. In our present study, there was a significant improvement in the eggshell weight of laying quails fed diets supplemented with 4000 mg/kg nSiO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…calcite or apatite. However, as has been found in vertebrates, silica deposition is seen prior to the ossification process forming calcium-apatite bones (Carlisle, 1986). The morphogenetic role of silicon is not restricted to mammals, but has also been identified already in sponges (Krasko et al, 2000).…”
Section: Role Of Silicon and Silicatementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The lower viability of the PC12 on (100) Si is not so easily explained, but the lower attachment quality shown by the AFM analysis indicates Si is not entirely favorable for this cell. The reaction of the cell and the substrate may be forming silicic acid, which can have a negative effect on the cell viability when present in large quantities (Carlisle, 1986). The moderate lamellipodia attachment to Si is most likely due to the negative charge of the substrate, and mirrors the results seen by (Fine et al, 1991;Makohliso et al, 1993), but attachment of the lamellipodia may have been altered due to the hydrophobic substrate surface (Clark et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%