2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.016
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silica and silicate precipitation as limiting factors in high-recovery reverse osmosis operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 4)-( 7) The experimental values of membrane performance indicators are rejection and relative permeability, at around 0.99 and 0.8-0.95, respectively. The experimental results indicate that the membrane performance agrees well with the performance reported in the literature for the commonly used RO membranes in the market (Okamoto and Lienhard 2019;Pendergast and Hoek 2011;Cob et al 2012). The developed membranes can compete well with the commercial RO membranes.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…( 4)-( 7) The experimental values of membrane performance indicators are rejection and relative permeability, at around 0.99 and 0.8-0.95, respectively. The experimental results indicate that the membrane performance agrees well with the performance reported in the literature for the commonly used RO membranes in the market (Okamoto and Lienhard 2019;Pendergast and Hoek 2011;Cob et al 2012). The developed membranes can compete well with the commercial RO membranes.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Silica scaling mainly caused by the polymerization of silicate onto a membrane surface was generally recognized as a challenging issue and hard to remove due to its Si–O–Si bonds formed through dehydration. The mitigation of silica scaling on a membrane mainly relied on pretreatment of feedwater or the addition of antiscalants. , Recent research demonstrated that membrane surface properties, inclusive of functional groups and surface charge, are essential elements influencing silica nucleation kinetics on the membrane surface. In particular, ionized silica species would be repelled by the negatively charged membrane surface at the initial silica nucleation, which could slow down the flux decrease resulting from silica scaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a major drawback in membrane technology is fouling, i.e. accumulation of unwanted material on the membrane and spacer surface (Antony et al, 2011;Baker and Dudley, 1998;Flemming, 2002;Ridgway et al, 1983;Salvador Cob et al, 2012). "Micro-sized particles, colloids, organic macromolecules can deposit and microbial cells can attach, grow and form biofilms on the membrane and spacer surfaces and decrease the filtration performance (Flemming, 1997;Tang et al, 2011;Yiantsios and Karabelas, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%