2018
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2018.1499123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silences around occupations framed as unhealthy, illegal, and deviant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
63
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Jones' initial descriptions of work and unemployment used paid employment as a reference point, but in a subsequent article, Jones (1998) wrote about "breaking down the distinction between work (usually 'paid employment' involving a master-servant relationship) and activity (including selfdirected tasks, such as repair and maintenance, often involving significant physical and mental effort)" (p. 127). Jones presented this call for reconceptualisation as a way to prevent dystopias of unemployment, wherein people filled their time with substance use and other non-sanctioned occupations (Kiepek et al, 2019). Jones (1998) argued for the need to "redefine employment or occupation to include those who work without pay, mostly at home" (p. 129); however, instead of expanding his conceptualisation of work to include leisure or unpaid work, he ultimately called for a broader societal revaluation of time use and the many occupations that might constitute a person's daily repertoire.…”
Section: Historical Conceptualisations Of Work Return-to-work and Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones' initial descriptions of work and unemployment used paid employment as a reference point, but in a subsequent article, Jones (1998) wrote about "breaking down the distinction between work (usually 'paid employment' involving a master-servant relationship) and activity (including selfdirected tasks, such as repair and maintenance, often involving significant physical and mental effort)" (p. 127). Jones presented this call for reconceptualisation as a way to prevent dystopias of unemployment, wherein people filled their time with substance use and other non-sanctioned occupations (Kiepek et al, 2019). Jones (1998) argued for the need to "redefine employment or occupation to include those who work without pay, mostly at home" (p. 129); however, instead of expanding his conceptualisation of work to include leisure or unpaid work, he ultimately called for a broader societal revaluation of time use and the many occupations that might constitute a person's daily repertoire.…”
Section: Historical Conceptualisations Of Work Return-to-work and Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, meaningful engagement in occupation arises from interests, values, and agency, and is subjectively and uniquely experienced and perceived. However, several occupational scientists have argued that research related to understanding the concept of occupation and its relation to health and well-being has been too narrow (Hocking, 2009;Kiepek et al, 2019;Twinley, 2013;Twinley & Addidle, 2012). We have situated our work in alignment with this critique.…”
Section: An Occupational Perspective Of Sex Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupation itself is recognised in a broader sense than lay language would denote (as paid work), and can be defined as: "The experiences of humans which necessitate active engagement, have purpose and meaning, and are contextualized" (Molineux, 2017). This current review will consider all of the different ways, definitions, or classifications of occupation that have been stated in the four seminal pieces of work relating to the dark side of occupation; two of these are written solely by the concept's creator (Twinley, 2013;, one was co-authored by Twinley (2012), and one article was written by a group of authors (Kiepek et al, 2019) who have cited Twinley's work in their paper. The latter paper is similar in theme and content to Twinley's 2013 article, and closely related to the concept of the dark side of occupation.…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%