2009
DOI: 10.1080/15022250902761462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silenced and Invisible: The Work‐experience of Room‐attendants in Norwegian Hotels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Aristarkhova () has observed, hospitality is intimate, and the nature of this intimacy could relate to misconstructions in the bedroom context. Our findings are consistent with a Norwegian study, which reported that some room attendants were afraid to work alone in guests' rooms (Onsøyen et al ., ). This finding aligns with sex role spill‐over theory, wherein gender roles take precedence over workplace roles (Welsh, ), meaning that workplace sexual harassment is more likely to occur in private working spaces such as hotel rooms than in public spaces.…”
Section: Job Gender Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As Aristarkhova () has observed, hospitality is intimate, and the nature of this intimacy could relate to misconstructions in the bedroom context. Our findings are consistent with a Norwegian study, which reported that some room attendants were afraid to work alone in guests' rooms (Onsøyen et al ., ). This finding aligns with sex role spill‐over theory, wherein gender roles take precedence over workplace roles (Welsh, ), meaning that workplace sexual harassment is more likely to occur in private working spaces such as hotel rooms than in public spaces.…”
Section: Job Gender Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the front stage employees in this hotel were able to express their opinions once per month, while the back stage employees could only directly voice their opinions four times per year when they attended conventions. Furthermore, because the way in which voice behavior was weighted was critical to the study (Milliken and Lam, 2009) and since hospitality managers usually undervalue, ignore, and even assign bad marks to back stage employees who engage in voice behavior (Onsøyen et al, 2009), due to the different objective appraisal methods used and the fewer opportunities that the back stage employees had to engage in voice behavior, we decided to delete the back stage employees from the sample. One thing to which attention needs to be paid is that, when we started this research project, we intended to assess employees' objective and subjective performances and included front stage and back stage employees at the outset.…”
Section: Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hotel industry, outsourcing housekeeping forged ahead in 2006. Further, there are examples of increases in the number of rooms to be cleaned, regardless of whether the service is outsourced (Onsøyen et al 2009;Elstad & Marsdal 2010;Hellvik 2011). How can this be explained?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%