2006
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72399-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silage Chop Length and Hay Supplementation on Milk Yield, Chewing Activity, and Ruminal Digestion by Dairy Cows

Abstract: The effects of whole-plant corn silage (CS) particle size and long unprocessed grass hay (LH) supplementation on milk yield, chewing activity, and ruminal digestion in dairy cows were evaluated in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, corn silage harvested at fine (6 mm; FCS) or coarse (23 mm; CCS) theoretical cut length were fed to 22 lactating Holstein cows. Treatments were 2 total mixed rations containing 58% of dry matter (DM) as FCS or CCS. Diet DM intake tended to be higher in cows fed FCS than those fed CCS (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
6
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results of previous studies (West et al 1997;Couderc et al 2006), the large variation in feed intake with changing the GH proportion was fully expected also in the current experiment when cows were offered diet ad libitum. As the objective of the current experiment was to detect whether the increased addition of GH in the CS-based diet could alter the ruminal passage rate of CS and GH, it was needed to exclude the effect of feed intake on rumen passage rate.…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake and Rumen Fillsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the results of previous studies (West et al 1997;Couderc et al 2006), the large variation in feed intake with changing the GH proportion was fully expected also in the current experiment when cows were offered diet ad libitum. As the objective of the current experiment was to detect whether the increased addition of GH in the CS-based diet could alter the ruminal passage rate of CS and GH, it was needed to exclude the effect of feed intake on rumen passage rate.…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake and Rumen Fillsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Recent reports have shown no effect of GH addition on the ruminal passage rate of finely chopped CS in cows fed on CS-based diets supplemented with 5% to 10% GH (Couderc et al 2006;Castro et al 2010). Recent reports have shown no effect of GH addition on the ruminal passage rate of finely chopped CS in cows fed on CS-based diets supplemented with 5% to 10% GH (Couderc et al 2006;Castro et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since chewing activity stimulates the secretion of saliva, which facilitates swallowing and contains high concentrations of bicarbonate and phosphate buffers that aid in buffering and sustaining the ruminal pH at a level suitable for microbial activity, which is physiologically 6.3 to 7.1 (Blikslager et al, 2004). The reduction of forage particle length shortens the time that cattle spend with chewing, increases ruminal acidity and the rate of content passage from the rumen, decreases fibre degradation and milk fat content (Beauchemin et al, 1997;Couderc et al, 2006). Significant differences in the duration of rumination were found between rations; excessive starch and easily fermentable carbohydrates in relation to the content of effective fibre stimulating rumination result in reduced chewing activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This adjustment represents the potential osmolality decrease in reticulorumen fluid, which in turn enhances net water transfer via the rumen wall (Anil et al, 1993;Storm et al, 2012). The adjusted fractional rate of the net water transfer Agle et al, 2010;Alamouti et al, 2009;Beauchemin et al, 2008;Beauchemin and Yang, 2005;Bowman et al, 2002Bowman et al, , 2003Canale et al, 1988;Casper et al, 1999;Cassida and Stokes, 1986;Couderc et al, 2006;Dado and Allen, 1995;Fernandez et al, 2004;Kammes and Allen, 2012;Kammes et al, 2012a,b;Kargar et al, 2010;Kendall et al, 2009;Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003a,b;Kononoff et al, 2003;Krämer et al, 2013;Krause et al, 2003;Le Liboux and Peyraud, 1998;Peyraud, 2010, 2011;Lykos et al, 1997;Maekawa et al, 2002;Mathew et al, 2011;Maulfair and Heinrichs, 2013a,b;Maulfair et al, 2010;Mooney and Allen, 2007;Mowrey et al, 1999;Noftsger et al, 2005;Oba and Allen, 2000;Rabelo et al, 2001;Reis and Combs, 2000a,b;Rius et al, 2012;Sairanen et al, 2005;San Emeterio et al, 2000;Soltani et al, 2009;Stensig and Robinson, 1997;…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%