1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1982.tb01588.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silage and milk production: comparisons between hays of different digestibilities as silage supplements

Abstract: In three separate feeding experiments using a total of thirty individually-housed Ayrshire eows three silages made from perennial ryegrass were given ad libitum together with supplements of four different hays in the long form. The in vitro D-values of the silages ranged from 0-598 to 0-683, and the hays from 0-580 to 0-700, The daily intake of hay DM varied from 0-8 to 4-1 kg per cow and was given either without or with a daily maximum of 2-4 kg concentrate DM containing 379-527 g CP per kg DM, On average, 1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Silage intake was lower, but not significantly, with the soybean supplement (treatment C) than with the silage-only ration (treatment A). This decrease, although not significant, is unlike the effect of soybean meal when offered as a supplement to grass silage in an earlier experiment (Retter and Castle, 1982) in which there was no significant effect on the intake of silage DM. A possible explanation for these different results could be the large difference in the crude protein (CP) concentrations in the grass and the clover silages in the two experiments and thus differences in the overall digestibility of the two diets which would affect intake.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Silage intake was lower, but not significantly, with the soybean supplement (treatment C) than with the silage-only ration (treatment A). This decrease, although not significant, is unlike the effect of soybean meal when offered as a supplement to grass silage in an earlier experiment (Retter and Castle, 1982) in which there was no significant effect on the intake of silage DM. A possible explanation for these different results could be the large difference in the crude protein (CP) concentrations in the grass and the clover silages in the two experiments and thus differences in the overall digestibility of the two diets which would affect intake.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%