2014
DOI: 10.1002/app.40506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significantly improving electro‐activated shape recovery performance of shape memory nanocomposite by self‐assembled carbon nanofiber and hexagonal boron nitride

Abstract: This study presents two effective approaches to significantly improve the electro‐thermal properties and electro‐activated shape recovery performance of shape memory polymer (SMP) nanocomposites that are incorporated with carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and hexagonal boron nitrides (h‐BNs), and show Joule heating triggered shape recovery. CNFs were self‐assembled and deposited into buckypaper form to significantly improve the electrical properties of SMP and achieve the shape memory effect induced by electricity. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This buckypaper is not only an efficient reinforcement but enables the electro-activated triggering (Joule heating) of SM at the same time. This possibility was explored by the group of Leng [ 140 , 141 , 142 ] who coated or impregnated the buckypaper with SMEP. In order to improve the heat conductivity of the buckypaper or the corresponding nanocomposites BN was also incorporated or blended into the EP, respectively.…”
Section: Shape Memory Ep Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This buckypaper is not only an efficient reinforcement but enables the electro-activated triggering (Joule heating) of SM at the same time. This possibility was explored by the group of Leng [ 140 , 141 , 142 ] who coated or impregnated the buckypaper with SMEP. In order to improve the heat conductivity of the buckypaper or the corresponding nanocomposites BN was also incorporated or blended into the EP, respectively.…”
Section: Shape Memory Ep Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, to improve the functionality of SMEPs, many types of additives and partners have been introduced into shape memory epoxy systems, including polyether (Merline et al, 2008), polymethyl methacrylate nanofibers (Iyengar et al, 2013), surface-modified TiO 2 nanoparticles (Iijima et al, 2009), montmorillonite (Liu et al, 2011), glass fiber fabrics (Fejos et al, 2012), magnetite nanoparticles (Puig et al, 2012), carbon black (Liang and Yun, 2013; Wei et al, 2013b; Yun and Liang, 2012), carbon nanofibers (CNFs) (Ding et al, 2014; Dong et al, 2013), glass fiber (Wei et al, 2013a), SiO 2 (Dong et al, 2015b; Dong and Ni, 2015), graphene oxide (Lu et al, 2014b), reduced graphene oxide paper (Wang et al, 2015b), carbon nanotube (CNT)/graphene aerogels (Liu et al, 2015), multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) (Yu et al, 2015), and CNF/hexagonal boron nitride (Lu et al, 2014a, 2015). In particular, the addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) into the SMEP system allowed us to successfully achieve water-induced shape memory recovery (Wang et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Typical Thermoset Smpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pure SMPs are not suitable for some practical applications (for example, aerospace engineering) that require improved mechanical strength, higher thermal stability, and stronger shape recovery force. Therefore, SMPs filled with various reinforcement particles (such as SiC, nanoclay, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and hybrid fillers,) were prepared and measured in order to meet the requirements. Among these fillers, carbonaceous materials are superior to the others because of their high surface areas and excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, SMPs filled with various reinforcement particles (such as SiC, nanoclay, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and hybrid fillers,) were prepared and measured in order to meet the requirements. Among these fillers, carbonaceous materials are superior to the others because of their high surface areas and excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties . The reported SMP composites filled by carbonaceous fillers focused on SMPU composites and PS‐SMP composites, while carbon‐filled ESMP has been barely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%