2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant wave height record extension by neural networks and reanalysis wind data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various reanalysis projects were developed overtime, of which we might mention Reanalysis I, maintained by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research, or the JRA-55 project developed by the Japanese Meteorological Society. Another major project is ERA40 (covering 45 years of data: September 1979-August 2002), maintained by the ECMWF, which was replaced by the ERA-Interim project (started in 1989) that is used in the current work to assess wave conditions from the Black Sea [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various reanalysis projects were developed overtime, of which we might mention Reanalysis I, maintained by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research, or the JRA-55 project developed by the Japanese Meteorological Society. Another major project is ERA40 (covering 45 years of data: September 1979-August 2002), maintained by the ECMWF, which was replaced by the ERA-Interim project (started in 1989) that is used in the current work to assess wave conditions from the Black Sea [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interest is motivated by the various advantages that characterize such a source [3]: the high energy density, greater than that of solar and wind; the easy prediction of the wave characteristics through numerical models [4,5]; the reduced energy loss during wave propagation in relative water depth. However, these benefits are offset by the following drawbacks: the high variability of the wave characteristic through time [6]; WECs are exposed to large environmental forces; high production costs compared to other devices as photovoltaic and wind turbines [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in cases where a dataset exhibits a data bias towards one class, the F-score test statistic is more representative than the accuracy of a classifier. It is used to analyze whether a classifier is able to achieve both high precision and high recall simultaneously (for details on precision, recall, F-score, ROC curves, etc., see (Peres, 2015;Rijsbergen, 1979)). The values for precision and recall were calculated to gauge the goodness of the classifier.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Algorithms Used To Classify Proxima Bmentioning
confidence: 99%