2004
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-2467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant Contribution of Germline BRCA2 Rearrangements in Male Breast Cancer Families

Abstract: Although screening for large deletions or duplications of the BRCA1 gene is becoming a routine component of the molecular diagnosis of familial breast cancer, little is known about the occurrence of such rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene. Because of the high frequency of BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families with at least one case of male breast cancer, we selected a cohort of 39 such families, tested negative for mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2, and developed an assay for BRCA2 rearrange… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
82
5
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
82
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…QMPSF analysis allowed us in this large series of suspected HNPCC patients to detect MSH2 and MLH1 duplications S Baert-Desurmont et al 10 distinct MSH2 or MLH1 partial genomic duplications, which were all confirmed by another independent method. This shows, as previously illustrated for the BRCA1, 27 BRCA2, 28 and APP genes, 29 that QMPSF is a reliable method for the detection of genomic duplications. Although we cannot provide in this study an accurate estimation of the contribution of MSH2 and MLH1 duplications to HNPCC, as the population analysed was heterogeneous including both AMS þ patients and AMSÀ patients with an MSI phenotype in the tumour, the frequency of MSH2 and MLH1 duplications appears low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…QMPSF analysis allowed us in this large series of suspected HNPCC patients to detect MSH2 and MLH1 duplications S Baert-Desurmont et al 10 distinct MSH2 or MLH1 partial genomic duplications, which were all confirmed by another independent method. This shows, as previously illustrated for the BRCA1, 27 BRCA2, 28 and APP genes, 29 that QMPSF is a reliable method for the detection of genomic duplications. Although we cannot provide in this study an accurate estimation of the contribution of MSH2 and MLH1 duplications to HNPCC, as the population analysed was heterogeneous including both AMS þ patients and AMSÀ patients with an MSI phenotype in the tumour, the frequency of MSH2 and MLH1 duplications appears low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, the present study indicates that primers previously designed for fluorescent multiplex PCR tests can be adapted for NFMP-HPLC. This could simplify the application of the method to other genes when the corresponding fluorescent tests have already been developed, such as for BRCA1 [Casilli et al, 2002], p53 [Bougeard et al, 2003], BRCA2 [Tournier et al, 2004], RB1 , and CFTR [Audrézet et al, 2004]. We also adjusted the number of cycles to optimize nonfluorescent detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiquantitative PCR protocols, which are more practical than FISH and Southern blot for routine applications, include semiquantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assays successfully adapted to the analysis of different genes [Charbonnier et al, 2000;Casilli et al, 2002;Schouten et al, 2002;Sellner and Taylor, 2004]. QMPSF is based on the simultaneous amplification of short genomic sequences that correspond to the different exons by fluorescently labeled primers, and several multiplex PCRs may be necessary to cover one gene [Charbonnier et al, 2000[Charbonnier et al, , 2002Wang et al, 2002;Casilli et al, 2002;Audrézet et al, 2004;Tournier et al, 2004]. MLPA has the advantage of being available as a commercial kit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These probes target the 13q-deleted region (D13S319, D13S25), the ATM gene, the TP53 gene and chromosome 12 centromere. As probes are expensive and as FISH is a time-consuming method, we aimed to evaluate the application of a quantitative PCR method (quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments [6][7][8] or QMPSFs) initially developed for the evaluation of constitutional aneuploidies to the somatic aneuploidies acquired by CLL patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%