2000
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200008000-00085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of the Cag Repeat Polymorphism of the Androgen Receptor Gene in Prostate Cancer Progression

Abstract: The length of the CAG repeat polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene may be important for prostate cancer recurrence among patients who are otherwise at low risk for recurrence after radical prostatectomy. These findings have potential implications for patient selection for adjuvant treatment, and for the development of novel treatments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variable number of CAG repeats (CAGr) in exon 1 of the AR gene on the X-chromosome, which normally ranges between 9 and 35 [27,28] encodes for a variable number of glutamine residues in the aminoterminal domain of the receptor and is inversely associated with the transcriptional activity of testosterone target genes [29,30]. As clinical consequences, the number of CAGr was shown to be inversely associated with the risk of prostate cancer [27,28,31,32,33], benign prostatic hyperplasia [34,35], sperm production [36,37], bone density [38], endothelial function and HDL-cholesterol concentrations [39] as well as depression [40]. Furthermore, abnormal expansion of the CAGr length leads to Kennedy's disease, which is accompanied by morphological hypoandrogenic traits [41,42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variable number of CAG repeats (CAGr) in exon 1 of the AR gene on the X-chromosome, which normally ranges between 9 and 35 [27,28] encodes for a variable number of glutamine residues in the aminoterminal domain of the receptor and is inversely associated with the transcriptional activity of testosterone target genes [29,30]. As clinical consequences, the number of CAGr was shown to be inversely associated with the risk of prostate cancer [27,28,31,32,33], benign prostatic hyperplasia [34,35], sperm production [36,37], bone density [38], endothelial function and HDL-cholesterol concentrations [39] as well as depression [40]. Furthermore, abnormal expansion of the CAGr length leads to Kennedy's disease, which is accompanied by morphological hypoandrogenic traits [41,42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among published literature, both 18 and 22 repeat units have been used as cutoff definitions for short CAG repeat length with which significant relationships have been found with risk of developing prostate cancer, earlier age of diagnosis, and cancer aggressiveness. 5,9,17 Thus, similar CAG repeat lengths cutoff points were used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a number of studies have not found an association between CAG repeat length and overall risk of prostate cancer, age of diagnosis, or aggressiveness. 8,10,13,[15][16][17] This discrepancy in the significance of the CAG repeat length as a predictor for prostate cancer behaviour may reflect the limited number of studies and small patient numbers, differences in patient selection between studies, technical differences in evaluating the CAG length, or a combination of factors. Standard treatment in advanced prostate cancer involves ADT to halt tumour progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Men with prostate cancer, who were at a low risk for recurrence by conventional prognosticators, were found to have a relative risk of recurrence of 8.07 if they had 18 or less CAG repeats. 6 Several authors have reported on the role of AR expression as a prognostic marker for response to hormone therapy, time to tumor progression, and as an indicator of tumor aggressiveness. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] A review of the literature on clinical studies involving AR expression shows a wide variation in tissue sampling, methods used for estimation of AR expression and correlation of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%