1995
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.5.1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of molecular marker-positive cells after autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Abstract: The results show that the reappearance or persistence of marker-positive cells after autologous PBSCT is strongly associated with relapse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gribben et al (1994) report that the reappearance of circulating positive cells is strongly associated with relapse after myeloablative therapy. Similar results are shown by Hardingham et al (1995). Recently, 50-70% of cases with peripheral blood clearance have been reported after non-myeloablative therapy, both in responders and in non-responders (Betticher et al, 1996;Cabanillas et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Gribben et al (1994) report that the reappearance of circulating positive cells is strongly associated with relapse after myeloablative therapy. Similar results are shown by Hardingham et al (1995). Recently, 50-70% of cases with peripheral blood clearance have been reported after non-myeloablative therapy, both in responders and in non-responders (Betticher et al, 1996;Cabanillas et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…If it would be possible to predict disease control after first-line therapy, these therapies could be selected for patients with a high likelihood of early relapse. With qualitative PCR, several studies were able to document a relationship between molecular response and time to relapse in patients treated with standard-dose chemotherapy [4,5,26], with high-dose chemotherapy [7,[27][28][29][30] and with rituximab-containing regimen [8,31,32]. Due to the low number of patients and the limited follow-up time of 6 months, we can only speculate on the role of molecular diagnostics for the prediction of relapsed disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will probably be difficult to alter the outcome of ASCT-refractory patients, that is, those with overt disease progression soon after transplant. However, the identification of patients in a minimal disease state, as some studies suggest is possible, [45][46][47] may allow the introduction of novel post transplant nonmyelosuppressive therapy, such as monoclonal antibodies and adoptive cellular therapy, that may eradicate residual disease and thereby prevent late relapses. Therefore, in addition to the development of novel agents and modalities to treat patients with overt disease progression after ASCT failure, efforts should be directed at assessing the utility and feasibility of detecting and treating ASCT failure early, in a minimal residual disease state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%