Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI

Problem This study sought to evaluate the value of motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) for selecting euploid spermatozoa in six patients who were heterozygous for a reciprocal translocation. Method of study We used sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to screen for aneuploidy of the chromosomes involved in the translocations and a putative interchromosomal effect (ICE) for chromosomes 18, X and Y. This procedure was performed on (i) whole sperm (i.e. no selection) and on normal spermatozoa selected (ii) at a magnification typically used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), referred to as "ICSIlike", and (iii) with MSOME. Results The balanced translocation rates did not differ significantly (p=0.81) when comparing whole sperm (57.2 %) with spermatozoa after ICSI-like selection (56.3 %) or after MSOME (53.7 %). Similarly, the aneuploidy rates for ICEs did not differ significantly (p=0.14) when comparing whole sperm (1.9 %), ICSI-selected spermatozoa (3.4 %) and MSOME-selected spermatozoa (1.0 %). Conclusion For patients who are heterozygous for reciprocal translocations, MSOME does not improve the selection of euploid spermatozoa.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

High-magnification sperm selection does not decrease the aneuploidy rate in patients who are heterozygous for reciprocal translocations

Chelli

Ferfouri

Boitrelle

et al. 2013

“…The authors proposed a global impairment of the spermatogenesis process as a common origin of the morphological alterations. Accordingly, Franco Jr. et al [23] showed an association between large nuclear vacuoles and DNA damage in spermatozoa.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Previous studies demonstrated that sperm nuclear vacuoles are associated with sperm DNA fragmentation [11,23,24,35].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The predictive value of high-magnification sperm morphology examination on ICSI outcomes in the presence of oocyte dysmorphisms

Setti

Braga

Figueira

et al. 2012

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between oocyte dysmorphisms and IMSI outcomes Methods Data of IMSI cycles performed in 332 patients were included in this study. Patients were included only if presented more than four and less than 30 oocytes upon oocyte retrieval. Patients who underwent IMSI were matched, concerning female age and sperm parameters, with patients who underwent ICSI in the same period (n0332). The two groups (ICSI and IMSI) were compared with regard to treatment outcomes. The influence of IMSI on fertilization and embryo quality on D3 and D5, when oocyte dysmorphisms were present was analyzed. Results A total of 6444 oocytes were morphologically evaluated and injected. Regardless of the oocyte quality, IMSI performance was a determinant of the increased odds of development to high quality embryo on D3 (OR: 1.98; CI: 1.54-2.56) and D5 (OR: 3.27; CI: 1.61-6.66). Conclusions The selection of a morphologically normal spermatozoon under high-magnification is associated with increased embryo quality, regardless of the oocyte morphology. The injection of a spermatozoon, selected under highmagnification, into a morphologically normal oocyte leads to the highest probability of developing high quality embryos.

“…This technique revealed a new morphological criterion in human spermatozoa: the presence of nuclear vacuoles. Several studies have found increased levels of fragmented DNA in spermatozoa with large vacuoles [2][3][4][5], whereas others [6,7] have shown abnormalities of chromatin condensation in such spermatozoa. Although the origin of these vacuoles raises many questions, some strong correlations have been established between the morphology of the spermatozoon, in particular the presence of large vacuoles, and its nuclear quality (degree of chromatin condensation and/or DNA integrity, chromosomal content) [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures

Gatimel

Parinaud

Léandri

2016

Purpose Assessment of sperm morphology has been reconsidered since 2001 with the development of motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). This observation technique that combines high magnification microscopy and the Nomarski interference contrast makes it possible to select spermatozoa with as few vacuoles as possible before microinjection into the oocyte (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, IMSI). More than 10 years after the development of IMSI, the indications of the IMSI technique and its ability to increase pregnancy and/ or birthrates (compared with conventional ICSI) are still subject to debate. We aimed to better define the interest of IMSI in the third attempt. Methods We assessed the benefit of IMSI by carrying out a retrospective comparative study between IMSI and conventional ICSI during a third ART attempt. Two hundred sixteen couples with two previous ICSI failures were studied between February 2010 and June 2014. Results IMSI did not significantly improve the clinical outcomes compared with ICSI, either for implantation (12 vs 10 %), clinical pregnancy (23 vs 21 %), or live birth rates (20 vs 19 %).Conclusion This study provides supplementary arguments for not achieving IMSI procedure in the third attempt after two previous ICSI failures.