2021
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Glasgow Prognostic Scores in NSCLC Patients Treated With Immunotherapy After Platinum-based Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Abstract: Background/Aim: Little is known about the prognostic role of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy after platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: This study used a lung cancer cohort of the Catholic Medical Center of Korea between January 2018 and September 2020. Results: A total of 78 patients with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy as second or further-line therapy were included. Higher GPS values were significant predict… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical information was systematically recorded by qualified managers to improve data accuracy. Researchers were permitted access to newly assigned serial numbers after anonymizing the dataset (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical information was systematically recorded by qualified managers to improve data accuracy. Researchers were permitted access to newly assigned serial numbers after anonymizing the dataset (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of today, several different combined scores have provided interesting results in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) combines c-reactive protein levels >10 mg/L and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L), defining three different scores: 0: CRP < 10 mg/L and albumin > 35 g/L; 1: CRP ≥ 10 mg/L or albumin < 35 g/L; or 2: CRP > 10 mg/L and albumin < 35 g/L; higher GPS are associated with lower PFS and OS results in patients receiving ICIs [106,107]. Similarly, the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) takes into account NLR (>3 as cutoff) and LDH (>upper limit of normal as cutoff), defining three scores: good (0 factor), intermediate (1 factor), and poor (2 factors); in several large studies, higher scores represent a poor prognostic factor [108][109][110].…”
Section: Combined Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%