2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.657967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of expert competence consideration in group decision making using AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact can affect the results of the evaluation process. For example, results of the Tsyganok et al (2012) experiment 'confirm the presumption that un-der large expert numbers competence of individual experts does not matter significantly and can be neglected, but if the number of experts in a group is relatively small, expert competence should always be taken into consideration'. To reduce the risk of slightly insignificant evaluation results collection, organisations should involve experts into the evaluation process as much as possible.…”
Section: Rational Approach To Job Advertisements Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This fact can affect the results of the evaluation process. For example, results of the Tsyganok et al (2012) experiment 'confirm the presumption that un-der large expert numbers competence of individual experts does not matter significantly and can be neglected, but if the number of experts in a group is relatively small, expert competence should always be taken into consideration'. To reduce the risk of slightly insignificant evaluation results collection, organisations should involve experts into the evaluation process as much as possible.…”
Section: Rational Approach To Job Advertisements Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The degree of conflict ranges from 0 to 1, with a higher value indicating greater conflict between two land-use types. In determining the degree of conflict, in addition to reference to previous studies (Ligmann-Zielinska et al 2005;Cao et al 2011Cao et al , 2012, we adopt the analytic hierarchy process (Tsyganok et al 2012) to collect and analyze the suggestions of experts, decision-makers, and various stakeholders. The final degrees of conflict are presented in Table 4, and the objective of minimizing the incompatibility of neighboring land-use types is represented by Eq.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent AHP study by de FSM Russo and Camanho (2015) reviewed the literature (33 other AHP studies) thoroughly but used only one expert in their AHP analysis [40]. Another study, Tsyganok et al (2012), suggests that " . .…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. if the number of experts in a group is relatively small, expert competence should always be taken into consideration" [41].…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%