2020
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of examined lymph nodes number and metastatic lymph nodes ratio in overall survival and adjuvant treatment decision in resected laryngeal carcinoma

Abstract: Objective:The value of adjuvant therapy in resected laryngeal cancer remains controversial. This large SEER-based cohort study aimed to investigate the existing parameters of lymph node status that could predict survival outcomes and the prognostic value of adjuvant treatment in resected laryngeal carcinoma. Methods: Population-based data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-18) Program on patients after laryngectomy and lymphadenectomy (2004-2015) were analyzed. The optimal cut-off va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In concordance with our results, a recent retrospective SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program, National Cancer Institute) database analysis considered an apparently bilateral nodal yield cut-off of n > 50 as an independent prognosticator for overall survival (HR: 0.794, p = 0.006) using a dataset of partial laryngectomy and TL patients (Zhu et al 2020 ). The lack of a statistically significant NY cut-off at n = 50 in our work might be attributable to the low sample size of n = 37.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In concordance with our results, a recent retrospective SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program, National Cancer Institute) database analysis considered an apparently bilateral nodal yield cut-off of n > 50 as an independent prognosticator for overall survival (HR: 0.794, p = 0.006) using a dataset of partial laryngectomy and TL patients (Zhu et al 2020 ). The lack of a statistically significant NY cut-off at n = 50 in our work might be attributable to the low sample size of n = 37.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This might be due to the earlier timespan (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014), the lower mean nodal count of n = 18.7 (not reaching the current mean/ipsilateral count of n = 26.9), and the lack of sufficient adjuvant treatment protocols. The estimated 5-year OS rates of 60% (from date of first diagnosis) and 57% (from date of TL) for the entire cohort are notably higher than stated in other earlier studies [51.1% (Zhu et al 2020), 48% (Sullivan et al 2019), 40% (McGuire et al 2019, and 32.1% (Böttcher et al 2016)], which was not solely attributable to NY count.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…There are still several limitations in the present study which should be highlighted, including its retrospective nature and potential selection biases [20] . Furthermore, information about some potential prognostic factors, such as the detailed chemotherapy protocol, molecular or genomic data, were not available in this database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The prognostic predicting significance of LNR on patients with laryngeal cancer calculated at baseline has been described recently 25 , 26 . This surrogate mathematical marker was also included in the nomogram recently proposed by Zhu et al and facilitates risk stratification for the decision of adjuvant treatment 27 . Nevertheless, the prognostic influence of LNR has not been validated in the long-term follow-up by time-dependent regression models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%