2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of carbon additive in negative lead-acid battery electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that any addition, not just carbon, which modified the pore structure in such a manner would result in an improvement in performance. This theory is supported by Calebeck and Micka, et al 6,7,8 where both titania (TiO 2 ) and alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) were found to provide improvements similar to those obtained by carbon, though their argument was that, in addition to obstructing large pores in the NAM, the additions hindered growth of PbSO 4 crystals, preventing the formation of the large crystallites associated with sulfation. Valenciano, et al 9 also observed a beneficial effect of an inert addition, in their case glass fibers, though the resulting improvement appeared to depend on the manner in which the battery itself was assembled.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…They concluded that any addition, not just carbon, which modified the pore structure in such a manner would result in an improvement in performance. This theory is supported by Calebeck and Micka, et al 6,7,8 where both titania (TiO 2 ) and alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) were found to provide improvements similar to those obtained by carbon, though their argument was that, in addition to obstructing large pores in the NAM, the additions hindered growth of PbSO 4 crystals, preventing the formation of the large crystallites associated with sulfation. Valenciano, et al 9 also observed a beneficial effect of an inert addition, in their case glass fibers, though the resulting improvement appeared to depend on the manner in which the battery itself was assembled.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…They concluded that any addition, not just carbon, that modified the pore structure in such a manner would result in an improvement in performance. This theory is supported by Calebeck and Micka, et al 6,7,8 where both titania (TiO 2 ) and alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) were found to provide improvements similar to those obtained by carbon, though their argument was that, in addition to obstructing large pores in the NAM, the additions hindered growth of PbSO 4 crystals, preventing the formation of the large crystallites associated with sulfation. Valenciano, et al 9 also observed a beneficial effect of an inert addition, in their case glass fibers, though the resulting improvement appeared to depend on the manner in which the battery itself was assembled.…”
Section: Fy11 Quarter 1 Project Status Summary Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It was commonly accepted that the primary function of the carbon material was to clear the negative electrodes during formation [18]. It was also described that the carbon additive could influence the porosity of the negative electrodes [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%