2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signet ring cell carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: National trends on treatment effects and prognostic outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our study, gastric SRCC exhibits different clinicopathological features compared with other types of gastric adenocarcinoma; for example, it occurs more frequently in females and develops at a relatively younger age. This finding was similar to related reports from previous studies[ 15 , 16 ], although the exact cause was not yet clear. It has been proposed that the cancerization of SRCC might be influenced by sex hormones, especially estrogen receptor (ER).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our study, gastric SRCC exhibits different clinicopathological features compared with other types of gastric adenocarcinoma; for example, it occurs more frequently in females and develops at a relatively younger age. This finding was similar to related reports from previous studies[ 15 , 16 ], although the exact cause was not yet clear. It has been proposed that the cancerization of SRCC might be influenced by sex hormones, especially estrogen receptor (ER).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies have suggested that gastric SRCC has a better prognosis than other types of gastric adenocarcinoma at an early stage, but the survival outcome of patients with advanced-stage disease is still controversial[ 16 , 20 - 23 ]. According to our present analysis of the prognosis of 83 SRCC patients, the 3-year CSS rate was 73.7%, and that of patients with advanced-stage disease was 63.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signet ring cell carcinoma always lead to poor prognosis [27], which was not obtained in our study since this pathological type accounted for only 2.9%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…However, there are important molecular differences described between the two entities that explain the lower rates of response and survival in the appendiceal cancer population [ 2 ]. The latter also has higher rates of signet ring cells (SRC) subtype that are associated with ominous prognosis in any primary [ 33 ]. In spite of the absence of specific chemotherapy protocols, it has been shown that patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC), non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) and SRC all benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, while there is little data about the results of induction treatment [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential role of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy was already emphasized in other appendiceal entities (pseudomyxoma) [ 38 ]. The probable effectiveness of other types of intraperitoneal administrations in the context of peritoneal disease of appendiceal origin adds to the rationale of PIPAC, in spite of the clinical setting of the present study that is limited to appendiceal adenocarcinoma [ 12 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%