2019
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of fluid–fluid displacement in porous media: wettability, patterns and pressures

Abstract: We develop a novel "moving capacitor" dynamic network model to simulate immiscible fluid-fluid displacement in porous media. Traditional network models approximate the pore geometry as a network of fixed resistors, directly analogous to an electrical circuit. Our model additionally captures the motion of individual fluid-fluid interfaces through the pore geometry by completing this analogy, representing interfaces as a set of moving capacitors. By incorporating pore-scale invasion events, the model reproduces,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

6
71
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the injection pressure shows fluctuations in a stick-slip manner for all θ and φ 0 , as has been documented in slow drainage experiments [53][54][55] and simulations [44]. As θ decreases, indicating that the substrate becomes more wetting to the invading fluid, the fluid-fluid displacement is controlled by cooperative pore-filling events (touch and overlap) with smaller P cap compared with burst events [35,36,43,44]. This explains the general decreasing trend of injection pressure as θ decreases [ Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the injection pressure shows fluctuations in a stick-slip manner for all θ and φ 0 , as has been documented in slow drainage experiments [53][54][55] and simulations [44]. As θ decreases, indicating that the substrate becomes more wetting to the invading fluid, the fluid-fluid displacement is controlled by cooperative pore-filling events (touch and overlap) with smaller P cap compared with burst events [35,36,43,44]. This explains the general decreasing trend of injection pressure as θ decreases [ Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…These events determine how the interface advances, enlisting one or more new particles when a node on the interface reaches its filling capacity and becomes unstable. This model reproduces both the displacement pattern and the injection pressure signal under a wide range of capillary numbers and substrate wettabilities [43,44,50]. and initial packing densities φ 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations