2022
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-40-665-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signature of gravity wave propagations from the troposphere to ionosphere

Abstract: Abstract. We observed a gravity wave (GW) signature in the OH emission layer in the upper mesosphere, and 4 h later, a medium-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance (MSTID) in the OI 630 nm emission layer. Spectral analysis of the two waves showed that both have almost the same wave characteristics: wavelength, period, phase speed and propagation direction, respectively, 200 km, 60 min, 50 m s−1, toward the southeast. From the gravity wave ray-tracing simulation for the mesospheric gravity wave, we found tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupling between GWs and the ionosphere in the Martian ionosphere has been previously reported (Leelavathi et al., 2023; Roeten et al., 2022). GWB can modify the background wind fields, thus affecting the ionospheric plasma (Takahashi et al., 2022). Neutral winds have been measured by the MAVEN/NGIMS since 2016, but no observational data for neutral winds is available during the event in Figures 2 and 3, because the NGIMS closed its routine measurements of neutral atmospheric density when it initiated wind observations (Benna et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coupling between GWs and the ionosphere in the Martian ionosphere has been previously reported (Leelavathi et al., 2023; Roeten et al., 2022). GWB can modify the background wind fields, thus affecting the ionospheric plasma (Takahashi et al., 2022). Neutral winds have been measured by the MAVEN/NGIMS since 2016, but no observational data for neutral winds is available during the event in Figures 2 and 3, because the NGIMS closed its routine measurements of neutral atmospheric density when it initiated wind observations (Benna et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that GWB can modulate the background wind field (Ji et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2014; Takahashi et al., 2022; Yiğit et al., 2021). To better elucidate the process of ionospheric instability formation driven by wind shear associated with GWs, we performed nonlinear numerical simulations with wind shear as the source of perturbation to initiate the process.…”
Section: Simulation Of Gwb Related Wind Shear As Source Of Perturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a time-dependent, observationally based, global empirical specification of the upper atmospheric general circulation patterns and migrating tides. This allows the retrieval of GW intrinsic parameters, such as the direction of horizontal propagation source of the GWs as inputs for raytracing models [66,67]. In this study, high-altitude zonal and meridional winds are extracted from the model to obtain intrinsic parameters from nightglow images (Figure 3).…”
Section: Empirical Model Of Horizontal Winds Hwm14mentioning
confidence: 99%