2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signature alignment based on GMM for on-line signature verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Signature attributes (speed, acceleration, direction of movement of the pen, pressure) are represented as time series in a functional approach. Comparison is performed using measures of elastic distance, for example, dynamic transformation of the time scale [17][18][19].…”
Section: A Handwritten Signature Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signature attributes (speed, acceleration, direction of movement of the pen, pressure) are represented as time series in a functional approach. Comparison is performed using measures of elastic distance, for example, dynamic transformation of the time scale [17][18][19].…”
Section: A Handwritten Signature Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pixel-scale alignment of offline handwriting has received some attention, albeit less than other alignment problems and mostly for rigid or affine transformations. Alignment has long been significant for online signature matching [1]. In other contexts such as word spotting, pixel-scale alignment has been treated more as a means to an end than as a goal in its own right.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slight bias towards likely pairings can help the solution to converge quickly, but overcommitment at this stage can also lead to suboptimal results. The proposed initialization strategy starts with plausible relative probabilities for matching at each of the opposite model's keypoints, and expands this to a full 2D probability distribution via the following process: (1) interpolate squared log probabilities between keypoints on the handwriting skeleton; (2) use a generalized distance transform (GDT) [12] to extend to all other points by adding their squared distance from the skeleton as a penalty; (3) normalize the entire 2D probability distribution to sum to 1.…”
Section: A Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, matching procedures or special function parameter calculations are a need between signatures, requiring more time and space. The common approaches include Dynamic Time Wrapping (DTW) [13], its improved version [14,15,16,17,18,19] and the hidden Markov model (HMM) [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%