2013
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signalling of Arabidopsis thaliana response to Pieris brassicae eggs shares similarities with PAMP-triggered immunity

Abstract: Insect egg deposition activates plant defence, but very little is known about signalling events that control this response. In Arabidopsis thaliana, oviposition by Pieris brassicae triggers salicylic acid (SA) accumulation and induces the expression of defence genes. This is similar to the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are involved in PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). Here, the involvement of known signalling components of PTI in response to oviposition was studied. Treatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
169
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SA accumulates upon oviposition and the expression of SA-and NPR1-dependent genes (e.g. PR1) is activated (Little et al, 2007;Bruessow et al, 2010, Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013. In addition, egg-induced SA accumulation is known to inhibit larvae-induced expression of JAdependent genes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SA accumulates upon oviposition and the expression of SA-and NPR1-dependent genes (e.g. PR1) is activated (Little et al, 2007;Bruessow et al, 2010, Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013. In addition, egg-induced SA accumulation is known to inhibit larvae-induced expression of JAdependent genes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED1 (PR1) is strongly up-regulated at the site of oviposition in response to P. brassicae eggs but also in response to egg extracts from other insect species, including the generalist Spodoptera littoralis (Bruessow et al, 2010). Findings that SA accumulates to high levels following P. brassicae oviposition and that mutants in ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1, SALICYLIC ACID-DEFICIENT2 (SID2), and NPR1 are deficient in egg-induced PR1 expression indicate that eggs activate the SA pathway (Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013;Bruessow et al, 2010). Interestingly, egg-induced SA was shown to antagonize the JA pathway by inhibiting the expression of insect-induced defense genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) and directly induces the expression of CHIT (Supplemental Fig. S12), a chitin-responsive gene (Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013). Remarkably, an analysis of ROS burst in the cerk1-2 mutant impaired in the chitin response indicated reduced ROS production after NAD application (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Nad On Metabolomics Pattern Matches That Of Elmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Briefly, four leaves from 5-week-old plants were pooled (n = 3), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen 20 h after infection with Pst-AvrRpm1 or 24 h after syringe infiltration with water or NAD + (1 mM), and then stored at 280°C until RNA extraction and RT-qPCR analyses. mRNA abundances were expressed relative to the ACTIN2 reference gene (At3g18780) using previously described gene-specific primers (Oelze et al, 2012;Pétriacq et al, 2012;Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013;Gruner et al, 2013;Pétriacq et al, 2016). The sequences of RT-qPCR primers are given in Supplemental Table S4.…”
Section: Transcript Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four leaves from different plants were pooled (n = 4), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen at 2 and 5 dai, then stored at 280°C until RNA extraction, reverse transcriptase conversion, and quantitative PCR analyses, as described previously (Luna et al, 2014). PCR amplification of PR1 (At2g14610), PR5 (At1g75040), WKY70 (At3g56400), ICS1 (At1g74710), and VSP2 (At5g24770) was performed using previously described gene-specific primers (Gouhier-Darimont et al, 2013;Gruner et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013). Relative transcript quantities were calculated according to (1 + E)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%