2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signaling, corporate governance, and the equilibrium dividend policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
28
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study used dividend per share because it is considered as a reliable measure of firms' dividend payment policy (Charalambidis & Papadopoulos, 2007). Additionally, and consistent with previous studies (e.g., Esqueda, 2016;Jiraporn et al, 2011;John & Knyazeva, 2006), this study employs the ratio of dividends to total assets as alternative proxy to check the robustness of our findings. Second, our main independent variables are board size (BS), board independence (BI), CEO duality (CEO), frequency of board meetings (BM), board gender diversity (BG) and audit committee size (AS).…”
Section: Definition Of Variables and Model Specificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study used dividend per share because it is considered as a reliable measure of firms' dividend payment policy (Charalambidis & Papadopoulos, 2007). Additionally, and consistent with previous studies (e.g., Esqueda, 2016;Jiraporn et al, 2011;John & Knyazeva, 2006), this study employs the ratio of dividends to total assets as alternative proxy to check the robustness of our findings. Second, our main independent variables are board size (BS), board independence (BI), CEO duality (CEO), frequency of board meetings (BM), board gender diversity (BG) and audit committee size (AS).…”
Section: Definition Of Variables and Model Specificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…First, to check the extent to which our main findings are robust to alternative dividend pay-out proxy, we use the ratio of dividends to total assets. This alternative dividend proxy has been employed in the current study because it is considered to be appropriate and also because it has widely been used in prior studies (e.g., Esqueda, 2016;Jiraporn et al, 2011;John & Knyazeva, 2006). Overall, after comparing the results reported in model 1 of Table 5 with the main OLS results, the findings remain relatively the same, and thereby indicating that the results of the current study are largely unaffected by potential problems that may be associated with the use of alternative dividend pay-out proxy.…”
Section: Additional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researches outline the fact that performing organization is by and large using a great financial communication strategy. Conversely, others theoretical frameworks argues that performing organization disclosure less to protect themselves from specific stakeholders (Talmor, 1981;Hennessy, Livdan & Miranda, 2010;Connelly, Certo, Ireland & Reutzel, 2011;Esqueda, 2016). The OP is considered to be more significant about predicting financial communication content because it is related to organization's success and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em relação à estrutura de governança os estudos indicam que maiores níveis de governança possibilitam que as empresas distribuam um menor volume de dividendos, pois os investidores estariam mais propensos a reinvestirem os lucros para financiamento de projetos de investimento com VPL positivo (ESQUEDA, 2015). Entretanto, esses resultados não se confirmam homogenea-mente.…”
Section: Política De Dividendos E Estrutura De Governança: Precedenteunclassified