2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signaling and mediation in games with common interests

Abstract: Players who have a common interest are engaged in a game with incomplete information. Before playing they get differential signals that stochastically depend on the actual state of nature. These signal not only provide the players with partial information about the state of nature but also serve as a correlation means.Different information structures induce different outcomes. An information structure is better than another, with respect to a certain solution concept, if the highest solution payoff it induces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In establishing the theorem, we will show constructively that if S is individually su¢ cient for S 0 and is a BCE random choice rule of (G; S), then we can use the BCE decision rule inducing and the Markov kernel establishing individual su¢ ciency to construct a BCE of (G; S 0 ) which induces ; this argument adapts an argument in Lehrer, Rosenberg, and Shmaya (2013). However, the results and arguments in Liu (2011) and Lehrer, Rosenberg, and Shmaya (2013) do not help prove the converse.…”
Section: An Immediate Corollary Of This Results Ismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 In establishing the theorem, we will show constructively that if S is individually su¢ cient for S 0 and is a BCE random choice rule of (G; S), then we can use the BCE decision rule inducing and the Markov kernel establishing individual su¢ ciency to construct a BCE of (G; S 0 ) which induces ; this argument adapts an argument in Lehrer, Rosenberg, and Shmaya (2013). However, the results and arguments in Liu (2011) and Lehrer, Rosenberg, and Shmaya (2013) do not help prove the converse.…”
Section: An Immediate Corollary Of This Results Ismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While Lehrer, Rosenberg, andShmaya (2010), (2013) are the closest works to ours, there is a large literature on the value of information in games, and we now discuss that work and its relation. Hirshleifer (1971) noted why information might be damaging in a many player context because it removed options to insure ex ante.…”
Section: Other Relations On Information Structures and Their Usesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We follow the formalization in Lehrer et al (2010Lehrer et al ( , 2013 and Bergemann and Morris (2015) that splits the Bayesian game in two components, so that strategic and informational aspects can be studied separately. First, we have a game with incomplete information G = I, Θ, ψ, (A i ) i∈I , (u i ) i∈I , where: I is a finite set of players, Θ is a finite set of states of nature, ψ ∈ ∆ (Θ) is a common prior with full support, and, for any player i, we have a finite set of actions A i , and a payoff function u i : A×Θ → R, where A = i∈I A i is the set of action profiles.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lehrer et al (2010Lehrer et al ( , 2013 clarify epistemically the role of different assumptions and information structures and study their effect on equilibrium behavior. Bergemann and Morris (2015) introduce a further broader notion of correlated equilibrium, which they call Bayes correlated equilibrium, and which they show characterizes behavior robust to varying information structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But under this assumption, the "correlation" in interim correlated rationalizability is no longer relevant, and it is equivalent to interim independent rationalizability; the belief invariant Bayes correlated equilibrium reduces to the belief invariant Bayesian solution of Forges (2006) and Lehrer, Rosenberg, and Shmaya (2010); and Bayes correlated equilibrium reduces to the Bayesian solution of Forges (1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%