2003
DOI: 10.1126/stke.2003.207.pe49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal Transduction and Genes-to-Behaviors Pathways in Psychiatric Diseases

Abstract: Although psychiatric diseases are among the most common and destructive of all human illnesses, the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying their complex origins remain to be elucidated. Dysfunction of critical intracellular signaling pathways is very likely to be involved. This conclusion is based on a number of observations, including the short- and long-term cellular effects of psychiatric drugs; the critical role signaling pathways play in neurotransmitter, neuropeptide, and neurohormone communication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, inhibition of GSK3b by phosphorylation following lithiuminduced AKT activation has been shown to exert antiapoptotic effects (Jope and Bijur, 2002). These results are consistent with the neurotrophic-neuroprotective effects of mood stabilizers and antidepressants thought, at least partially, to be mediated by inhibition of GSK3b (Manji et al, 2003;Silva et al, 2008). Furthermore, indirect (upstream) regulation of GSK3 constitutes a new target for the control of affective disorders and highlights the role of neuroplasticity in their induction and treatment (Mathew et al, 2008;Jope and Roh, 2006;O'Brien and Klein, 2007;McClung and Nestler, 2008).…”
Section: Adult Neurogenesis and Antidepressantsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, inhibition of GSK3b by phosphorylation following lithiuminduced AKT activation has been shown to exert antiapoptotic effects (Jope and Bijur, 2002). These results are consistent with the neurotrophic-neuroprotective effects of mood stabilizers and antidepressants thought, at least partially, to be mediated by inhibition of GSK3b (Manji et al, 2003;Silva et al, 2008). Furthermore, indirect (upstream) regulation of GSK3 constitutes a new target for the control of affective disorders and highlights the role of neuroplasticity in their induction and treatment (Mathew et al, 2008;Jope and Roh, 2006;O'Brien and Klein, 2007;McClung and Nestler, 2008).…”
Section: Adult Neurogenesis and Antidepressantsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These growth factors generally enhance adult neurogenesis and may exert behavioral antidepressant-like effects (Jin et al, 2002;Anderson et al, 2002;Khawaja et al, 2004;Malberg and Blendy, 2005;Schechter et al, 2005;Schmidt and Duman, 2007). Related to the modulation of trophic factors action, antidepressants and mood stabilizers regulate the activity of signal-transduction pathways, such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), protein kinase B (AKT), and glycogen synthase kinase 3b (GSK3b) cascades, which are strongly implicated in synaptic plasticity, response to stress, and induction of mood disorders (Manji et al, 2003;Duman et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcineurin and interacting proteins are uniquely positioned to regulate dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and other neuronal signaling pathways, alterations of which are observed in schizophrenia (17,18). Egr2 and Egr3 are regulated by calcineurin through activation of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-mediated transcription (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that genetic abnormalities in signaling components are often fully compatible with life, and in many instances, despite the often-ubiquitous expression of the signaling protein, these abnormalities are associated with circumscribed clinical manifestations (Manji et al, 2003a). These overt, yet relatively circumscribed, clinical manifestations are believed to ultimately arise from vastly different transcriptomes (all of the transcripts present at a particular time) in different tissues because of tissue-specific expression, haploinsufficiency, genetic imprinting, alternate splicing, varying stoichiometries of the relevant signaling partners in different tissues, and differences in the ability of diverse cell types to compensate for the abnormality (either autocrine or paracrine).…”
Section: Intracellular Signaling Molecules (A Perspective)mentioning
confidence: 99%