2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal-on electrogenerated chemiluminescence biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of microRNA-21 based on isothermal strand-displacement polymerase reaction and bridge DNA-gold nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with previous studies on the expression levels of miR-21 in different cancer cells. [23][24][25] The detection of miR-21 extracted from the two kinds of cells with a concentration of 10 4 cells mL À1 showed that the degree of fluorescence enhancement caused by miR-21 in MCF-7 cells was significantly higher than that in HeLa cells, which was consistent with the above conclusion.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…This result is consistent with previous studies on the expression levels of miR-21 in different cancer cells. [23][24][25] The detection of miR-21 extracted from the two kinds of cells with a concentration of 10 4 cells mL À1 showed that the degree of fluorescence enhancement caused by miR-21 in MCF-7 cells was significantly higher than that in HeLa cells, which was consistent with the above conclusion.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…For improving the detection limit of the ECL biosensor, Cui et al [ 101 ] amplified indirect signals with signal amplification techniques. This ECL biosensor was based on the double signal amplification of an isotherstranded display polymerase reaction (ISDPR) and bridge DNA–AuNPs nanocomposites.…”
Section: Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were carried out to analyze every step of the biosensor construction (shown in Figure A,B). The process begins with a finely polished GCE, which displays a definite redox peak of [Fe­(CN) 6 ] −3/–4 and a small EIS semicircle due to its thoroughly cleaned surface (curve a). , When AuNPs were assembled onto the GCE surface, the redox intensity rose slightly, and the semicircle was reduced to be negligible, indicating that the electrical conductivity was enhanced by AuNPs (curve b). , Subsequent modification of the versatile probe contributed to significant changes in CV and EIS measurements. As electron transfer was obstructed by the repulsive force of negatively charged DNA on [Fe­(CN) 6 ] −3 / –4 , the resistance (Ret) greatly increased, and the CV current significantly decreased (curve c) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…41,42 When AuNPs were assembled onto the GCE surface, the redox intensity rose slightly, and the semicircle was reduced to be negligible, indicating that the electrical conductivity was enhanced by AuNPs (curve b). 43,44 Subsequent modification of the versatile probe contributed to significant changes in CV and EIS measurements. As electron transfer was obstructed by the repulsive force of negatively charged DNA on [Fe-(CN) 6 ] −3 / −4 , the resistance (Ret) greatly increased, and the CV current significantly decreased (curve c).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%