2004
DOI: 10.1364/ao.43.004821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal modeling for low-coherence height-scanning interference microscopy

Abstract: We propose a computationally efficient theoretical model for low-coherence interferometric profilers that measure surface heights by scanning the optical path difference of the interferometer. The model incorporates both geometric and spectral effects by means of an incoherent superposition of ray bundles through the interferometer spanning a range of wavelengths, incident angles, and pupil plane coordinates. This superposition sum is efficiently performed in the frequency domain, followed by a Fourier transfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
86
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…12). This undesirable effect is strongly evident when the illumination bandwidth is also wide as confirmed by DeGroot and Lega [77] using circular lenses. It becomes even worse when the space between the objective lens and the sample surface is not occupied with a suitable index-matching liquid, which in turn forces the application of a dynamic focusing compensation technique as it was shown by Dubois et al [78].…”
Section: Lsc Effect On the Imaging Depthmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…12). This undesirable effect is strongly evident when the illumination bandwidth is also wide as confirmed by DeGroot and Lega [77] using circular lenses. It becomes even worse when the space between the objective lens and the sample surface is not occupied with a suitable index-matching liquid, which in turn forces the application of a dynamic focusing compensation technique as it was shown by Dubois et al [78].…”
Section: Lsc Effect On the Imaging Depthmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…10) In this study, the variation error of the angle of incidence over the aperture of high-NA objectives and the dispersion of the wafers are neglected over the illumination bandwidth. 11,12) After 30 the repeated measurements of microstructures with the GaAs transmission method, the standard error of step A is 0.0203 m and that of step B is 0.0238 m. Similarly, with the Si transmission method, the standard error of step A is 0.0085 m and that of step B is 0.0137 m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been presented in various forms, [8][9][10][11][12] all using frequency-domain analysis to combine models for the system and of the part being measured. Thus a caveat with model-based CSI is that film properties must be at least partly known to bound the search space and avoid degenerate solutions.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, where a ray bundle for a particular ðk; βÞ pair passes through a Mirau objective and reflects from the part. As previously presented in detail, 9 contributing ðk; βÞ pairs can be summed incoherently for each spatial frequency K, which is discretized using a conventional fast Fourier transform or equivalent.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%