1999
DOI: 10.1118/1.598475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signal formation and decay in CdTe x‐ray detectors under intense irradiation

Abstract: The response of Cd(Zn)Te Schottky and resistive detectors to intense x-rays is investigated in a commercial computed tomography (CT) system to assess their potential for medical diagnostics. To describe their signal height, responsivity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and detective quantum efficiency the devices are modeled as solid-state ionization chambers with spatially varying electric field and charge collection efficiency. The thicknesses and pixel areas of the discrete detector elements are 0.5-2 mm and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a detector has not been realised so far, because of the "polarization" effect, a reduction of the electric field strength inside the detector [8,17]. Immobile, trapped charge carriers accumulating during irradiation leading to a lower field inside the detector and recombination of charge carriers are responsible for this polarization effect [18,19]. Thus the mean height of pulses becomes smaller and hence the height of some pulses falls below the detection threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a detector has not been realised so far, because of the "polarization" effect, a reduction of the electric field strength inside the detector [8,17]. Immobile, trapped charge carriers accumulating during irradiation leading to a lower field inside the detector and recombination of charge carriers are responsible for this polarization effect [18,19]. Thus the mean height of pulses becomes smaller and hence the height of some pulses falls below the detection threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in a very good agreement with our previous estimate based on evaluation of room-temperature lux-ampere characteristics 11 as well as with results of measurements of discharge current performed on highresistivity CdTe and CdZnTe. 12 No shift of the PC peak was observed in the case of sample 5. This situation can correspond to one of the limiting cases of N deep < 10 12 cm )3 or N deep > 10 13 cm )3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The long term runaway of the detector currents in CdZnTe has recently also been observed at high bias on CdZnTe samples with high products [16]. Like CdZnTe, CdTe also suffers from time-dependent current signals [17]. These crystals all show a slow exponential decrease in signal amplitude under irradiation with typical time constants on the order of 70 s. After tube shut-off this is followed by an undershoot of the integrator current, which then only slowly returns to the baseline.…”
Section: A Long Timescalementioning
confidence: 98%